Veera Jacqueline, Lim Karen, Dowling Jason A, O'Connor Chelsie, Holloway Lois C, Vinod Shalini K
South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr;63(2):236-243. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12831. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue definition of pelvic tumours and organs. The aim of this study was to quantify differences in delineated clinical target volumes (CTVs) between computed tomography (CT) and MRI.
Twenty patients with locally advanced gynaecological malignancies were recruited. Patients underwent dedicated MRI simulation following CT simulation. Four clinicians independently contoured each CT and MRI. CTV structures were contoured using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines and lymph node CTV (LN-CTV) according to published guidelines. Interobserver variability was analysed using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute surface distance (MASD).
Gross tumour volume delineation was more consistent on MRI compared to CT, the DSC improved from 0.77 on CT to 0.81 on MRI, P < 0.01. GTV volumes were significantly smaller on MRI compared to CT (MRI 92 cc vs. CT 117 cc, P < 0.01). The LN-CTV and combined CTV volumes were both significantly smaller on MRI compared to CT (LN-CTV: MRI 324 cc vs CT 354 cc, P < 0.01 and combined CTV: MRI 560 cc vs CT 600 cc, P < 0.01). The LN-CTV DSC was 0.75 for both MRI and CT, and the combined CTV DSC was 0.81 for MRI and 0.80 for CT, P = 0.27. Vagina and parametria volumes exhibited more variability compared to other structures.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging contouring resulted in smaller and more consistently delineated volumes when compared to CT for most CTV structures. An MRI contouring atlas is provided to complement the existing RTOG contouring guidelines.
磁共振成像(MRI)能出色地清晰显示盆腔肿瘤和器官的软组织情况。本研究的目的是量化计算机断层扫描(CT)和MRI在勾画临床靶区(CTV)方面的差异。
招募了20例局部晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者。患者在CT模拟后接受专门的MRI模拟。四名临床医生分别独立勾勒每个CT和MRI图像。根据放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)指南勾勒CTV结构,并根据已发表的指南勾勒淋巴结CTV(LN-CTV)。使用骰子相似系数(DSC)和平均绝对表面距离(MASD)分析观察者间的变异性。
与CT相比,MRI上大体肿瘤体积的勾画更一致,DSC从CT上的0.77提高到MRI上的0.81,P<0.01。与CT相比,MRI上的GTV体积明显更小(MRI为92立方厘米,CT为117立方厘米,P<0.01)。与CT相比,MRI上的LN-CTV和联合CTV体积均明显更小(LN-CTV:MRI为324立方厘米,CT为354立方厘米,P<0.01;联合CTV:MRI为560立方厘米,CT为600立方厘米,P<0.01)。MRI和CT的LN-CTV DSC均为0.75,联合CTV的DSC在MRI上为0.81,在CT上为0.80,P=0.27。与其他结构相比,阴道和宫旁组织体积的变异性更大。
与CT相比,对于大多数CTV结构,MRI勾画能得出更小且更一致的体积。提供了一份MRI勾画图谱以补充现有的RTOG勾画指南。