Division of Nephrology and Hemodialysis, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Division of Nephrology and Hemodialysis, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
J Ren Nutr. 2019 Sep;29(5):438-443. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Malnutrition is a frequent complication in patients on hemodialysis (HD), even if its adequate appraisal remains one of the most complicated challenges in the HD scenario because of the limits of current malnutrition biomarkers. The aim of our study was to assess the relation of subjective nutritional tools Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Dialysis Malnutrition Score (DMS) with the objective malnutrition tool Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in elderly patients on HD.
This is a cross-sectional study involving 71 patients on maintenance HD. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to compare data of male and female patients on HD. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the variables tested in all patients.
GNRI was not different between male and female patients on HD, and it was negatively related to SGA and DMS: B, -0.05 (95% confidence interval, -0.08 to -0.02) P = 0.00 and B, -0.30 (95% confidence interval, -0.47 to -0.14) P = .00, respectively. Both continuous and categorical GNRI data were predictive of SGA = 3: Odds Ratio (OR), 0.74 (0.63 to 0.87) P = 0.00 and OR, 6.74 (1.54 to 29.45) P = 0.01, respectively. Similarly, GNRI data were related to DMS > 13: OR, 0.85 (0.76 to 0.85) P = 0.00 and 3.29 (1.08 to 10.05) P = 0.03, respectively. Continuous GNRI data remained significant in both male and female patients separately, whereas categorical GNRI data, only in male patients.
GNRI is a reliable nutritional tool predictive of subjective malnutrition scores SGA and DMS, pointing out a relation between objective and subjective malnutrition indexes in both genders.
即使目前营养不良生物标志物存在诸多局限性,营养评估仍然是血液透析(HD)患者最复杂的挑战之一,但营养不良仍是 HD 患者常见的并发症。本研究旨在评估主观营养工具主观整体评估(SGA)和透析营养评分(DMS)与客观营养工具老年营养风险指数(GNRI)在老年 HD 患者中的关系。
这是一项横断面研究,纳入 71 名维持性 HD 患者。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和卡方检验比较男女 HD 患者的数据。采用线性和逻辑回归模型评估所有患者的测试变量。
HD 患者的 GNRI 在男女之间无差异,且与 SGA 和 DMS 呈负相关:B,-0.05(95%置信区间-0.08 至-0.02)P = 0.00 和 B,-0.30(95%置信区间-0.47 至-0.14)P = 0.00,分别。GNRI 的连续和分类数据均预测 SGA=3:比值比(OR),0.74(0.63 至 0.87)P = 0.00 和 OR,6.74(1.54 至 29.45)P = 0.01,分别。同样,GNRI 数据与 DMS>13 相关:OR,0.85(0.76 至 0.85)P = 0.00 和 3.29(1.08 至 10.05)P=0.03,分别。连续 GNRI 数据在男女患者中均有显著意义,而分类 GNRI 数据仅在男性患者中具有显著意义。
GNRI 是一种可靠的营养工具,可预测 SGA 和 DMS 等主观营养不良评分,指出了两性之间客观和主观营养不良指标之间的关系。