Suppr超能文献

经颈动脉血运重建术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的解剖适应证。

Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1452-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.051. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative to transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS). We investigated the proportion of carotid arteries undergoing revascularization procedures that would be eligible for TCAR based on anatomic criteria and how many arteries at high anatomic risk for tfCAS would be amenable to TCAR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting between 2012 and 2015. Patients were excluded if computed tomography angiography of the neck was not performed within 6 months of the procedure. We assessed TCAR eligibility on the basis of the instructions for use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System (Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif) and high anatomic risk for tfCAS on the basis of anatomic factors known to make carotid cannulation more difficult or hazardous.

RESULTS

Of the 118 patients and 236 carotid arteries identified, 12 carotid arteries were excluded for presence of an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA). Of the remaining 224 carotid arteries, 72% were eligible for TCAR on the basis of the instructions for use criteria; 100% had 4- to 9-mm ICA diameters, 100% had ≥6-mm common carotid artery (CCA) diameter, 75% had ≥5-cm clavicle to carotid bifurcation distance, and 96% lacked significant CCA puncture site plaque. In addition, 7% of carotid arteries had bifurcation anatomy unfavorable for stenting; thus, of the entire cohort of arteries examined, 68% were eligible for TCAR. Hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-26; P < .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.3; P < .01), and older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P < .01) were independently associated with TCAR ineligibility, whereas white race (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-1.0; P = .048) and beta-blocker use (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P < .01) were independently associated with TCAR eligibility. In addition, 24% of carotid arteries were considered to be at high risk for tfCAS for the presence of a type III aortic arch (7.6%), severe aortic calcification (3.3%), tandem CCA lesions (7.1%), moderate to severe stenosis at the carotid ostium (8.9%), and tortuous distal ICA precluding embolic filter placement (4.5%). Active smoking (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10; P < .01), hyperlipidemia (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.2-14; P = .03), and older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P = .02) were independently associated with tfCAS ineligibility, whereas preoperative aspirin (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4; P < .001) or clopidogrel (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = .01) use was associated with tfCAS eligibility. Of the arteries that were considered to be at high risk for tfCAS, 69% were eligible for TCAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of carotid arteries in individuals selected for revascularization meet TCAR eligibility, making TCAR a viable treatment option for many patients.

摘要

目的

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)已成为经股颈动脉血管支架置入术(tfCAS)的替代方法。我们研究了根据解剖标准进行血管重建手术的颈动脉数量,以及有多少高解剖风险的颈动脉适合进行 TCAR。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2015 年期间接受颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术的连续患者进行了回顾性研究。如果颈部计算机断层血管造影术在手术 6 个月内未进行,则排除患者。我们根据 ENROUTE 经颈动脉神经保护系统(Silk Road Medical,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)的使用说明评估 TCAR 的资格,并根据已知使颈动脉插管更加困难或危险的解剖因素评估 tfCAS 的高解剖风险。

结果

在 118 名患者和 236 条颈动脉中,有 12 条颈动脉因存在闭塞的颈内动脉(ICA)而被排除在外。在剩下的 224 条颈动脉中,72%的颈动脉根据使用说明标准符合 TCAR 的要求;100%的 ICA 直径为 4-9mm,100%的颈总动脉(CCA)直径为 6mm 以上,75%的锁骨至颈动脉分叉距离为 5cm 以上,96%的 CCA 穿刺部位无明显斑块。此外,7%的颈动脉有不利于支架置入的分叉解剖结构;因此,在检查的整个动脉队列中,68%的颈动脉符合 TCAR 的要求。高脂血症(比值比[OR],6.7;95%置信区间[CI],1.7-26;P<.01)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(OR,3.5;95%CI,1.5-8.3;P<.01)和年龄较大(OR,1.1;95%CI,1.0-1.1;P<.01)与 TCAR 不合格独立相关,而白种人(OR,0.2;95%CI,0.0-1.0;P=.048)和β受体阻滞剂的使用(OR,0.3;95%CI,0.1-0.7;P<.01)与 TCAR 合格独立相关。此外,24%的颈动脉被认为存在 III 型主动脉弓(7.6%)、严重主动脉钙化(3.3%)、CCA 串联病变(7.1%)、颈动脉口中度至重度狭窄(8.9%)和远端 ICA 迂曲,妨碍了栓塞滤器的放置(4.5%),被认为存在 tfCAS 高风险。吸烟(OR,4.4;95%CI,1.9-10;P<.01)、高脂血症(OR,4.0;95%CI,1.2-14;P=.03)和年龄较大(OR,1.1;95%CI,1.0-1.1;P=.02)与 tfCAS 不合格独立相关,而术前阿司匹林(OR,0.1;95%CI,0.0-0.4;P<.001)或氯吡格雷(OR,0.3;95%CI,0.1-0.8;P=.01)的使用与 tfCAS 合格独立相关。在被认为 tfCAS 高风险的动脉中,69%的动脉符合 TCAR 的要求。

结论

选择进行血管重建手术的患者中,大多数颈动脉符合 TCAR 的资格,这使得 TCAR 成为许多患者的可行治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1452-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.051. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Anatomic criteria in the selection of treatment modality for atherosclerotic carotid artery disease.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1395-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.041. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

3
Transcarotid arterial revascularization is feasible and safe with concomitant inferior vena cava occlusion.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024 Jan 14;10(3):101414. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101414. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
"TCAR or nothing": the only options for some complex carotid stenosis.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Dec 17;10(2):101404. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101404. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Use of a prosthetic conduit for stent delivery in transcarotid artery revascularization for patients with unfavorable anatomy.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Jul 23;9(3):101271. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101271. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Teaching vascular anatomy: the anatomy we know, the anatomy we see or the anatomy we need?
Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Sep;45(9):1155-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03203-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
9
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Hybrid Carotid Revascularization with Transient Flow Reversal.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020 Sep-Oct;23(5):736-737. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_99_20. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

6
Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2150-2157. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016824. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Stroke Prevention: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 9;69(18):2266-2275. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.053.
8
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal.
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
10
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta: A Network Meta-Analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 28;69(8):924-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验