• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.经颈动脉血运重建术的结果:一项系统性综述。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Racial Differences in Adoption and Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization among High-Risk Adults with Carotid Artery Stenosis.高危颈动脉狭窄成人经颈动脉血管重建术的采用情况及预后的种族差异。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;113:370-381. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.036. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
3
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Outcomes following carotid revascularization in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中既往同侧颈动脉支架置入术后行颈动脉血运重建术的患者结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1705-1715.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
5
Evaluating postoperative outcomes in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting.评估颈部解剖结构复杂的患者接受经颈动脉血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的术后结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization with Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy.经颈动脉动态血流逆转血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术及颈动脉内膜切除术的系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.070. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
8
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Impact of embolic protection methods versus access types on outcomes of carotid artery stenting.栓塞保护方法与入路类型对颈动脉支架置入术结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):146-154.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.026. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
10
Carotid endarterectomy is less expensive than transcarotid artery revascularization.颈动脉内膜切除术比经颈动脉血管重建术费用更低。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):136-145.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.192. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Management and Treatment of Carotid Stenosis: Overview of Therapeutic Possibilities and Comparison Between Interventional Radiology, Surgery and Hybrid Procedure.颈动脉狭窄的管理与治疗:治疗选择概述及介入放射学、外科手术与杂交手术的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1679. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131679.
2
Intravascular lithotripsy prior to transcarotid arterial revascularization: A technical tale of two cases.经颈动脉血管重建术前的血管内碎石术:两例技术案例
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Dec 6;12:2050313X241297217. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241297217. eCollection 2024.
3
One Puncture, Two Solutions: Simultaneous Carotid and Iliac Artery Stenting.一针两治:同时进行颈动脉和髂动脉支架置入术
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66883. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66883. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy.经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的成本效益比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1910-1918.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.051. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
2
TransCarotid Revascularization With Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Carotid Endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative Surveillance Project.经颈动脉血运重建术伴动态血流反转与颈动脉内膜切除术在血管质量倡议监测项目中的比较。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):398-403. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004496. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease.ROADSTER 2 研究:经颈动脉血运重建术治疗重度颈动脉疾病患者的早期结果。
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2620-2629. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030550. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization with dynamic flow reversal in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion.经颈动脉血运重建术伴对侧颈动脉闭塞时的动态血流反转的转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):524-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.529. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Clinical competence statement of the Society for Vascular Surgery on training and credentialing for transcarotid artery revascularization.血管外科学会关于经颈动脉血管重建术培训和认证的临床能力声明。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):779-789. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.053. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization with Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy.经颈动脉动态血流逆转血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术及颈动脉内膜切除术的系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.070. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Treatment of Carotid Restenosis Using Transcarotid Revascularization.经颈动脉血管重建术治疗颈动脉再狭窄
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020 Jul;54(5):436-440. doi: 10.1177/1538574420923815. Epub 2020 May 12.
8
Complexity of Aortic Arch Anatomy Affects the Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.主动脉弓解剖结构的复杂性对经颈动脉血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的疗效产生影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
9
Cerebral monitoring during transcarotid artery revascularization with flow reversal via transcranial doppler ultrasound examination.经颅多普勒超声检查行颈动脉血运重建术中血流转流下的脑监测。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
10
The role of transfemoral carotid artery stenting with proximal balloon occlusion embolic protection in the contemporary endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术联合近端球囊阻断栓塞保护在当代颈动脉狭窄血管内治疗中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

经颈动脉血运重建术的结果:一项系统性综述。

Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.

Key Vascular Physiology and Applied Research Laboratory of Zhengzhou City, Henan, China.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1177/15910199221123283
PMID:36039496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310721/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ischemic stroke and disability caused by carotid artery stenosis have always been worldwide problems. At present, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) have been commonly used to treat carotid artery stenosis. Recently, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) seems to be another option.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase to find literatures comparing TCAR with TFCAS and CEA. The primary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), transient ischemic attack (TIA), death, cranial nerve injure (CNI), and operative time. Secondary outcomes were stroke, death, MI in the elderly; cost; radiation; and entry site complication.

RESULTS

Initial search of the literature included 165 articles, of which 12 studies were chosen in the end. These studies demonstrated high technical success rate of TCAR. Patients who received TCAR had lower risks of death, stroke/death and less radiation exposure compared to TFCAS. In meta analysis, the risk of stroke was significantly lower in TCAR group than TFCAS (OR 0.63; 95%CI 0.47-0.85). And there was no significant difference in TIA and MI. TCAR was associated with shorter operative time, lower risk of CNI and less blood loss compared to CEA. In older patients, the effect of TCAR was significantly better than that of TFCAS.

CONCLUSION

TCAR is associated with a lower risk of perioperative stroke compared to TFCAS. TCAR is also associated with shorter operative time, lower risk of CNI and less blood loss compared to CEA. TCAR may be a promising treatment option besides TFCAS and CEA.

摘要

背景

颈动脉狭窄导致的缺血性卒中和残疾一直是全球性问题。目前,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(TFCAS)已被广泛用于治疗颈动脉狭窄。最近,经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)似乎是另一种选择。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 以查找比较 TCAR 与 TFCAS 和 CEA 的文献。主要结局是卒 中、心肌梗死(MI)、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、死亡、颅神经损伤(CNI)和手术时间。次要结局是老年患者的卒 中、死亡、MI;成本;辐射;和入路部位并发症。

结果

最初的文献搜索包括 165 篇文章,最终选择了 12 项研究。这些研究表明 TCAR 的技术成功率很高。与 TFCAS 相比,接受 TCAR 的患者死亡、卒 中/死亡风险较低,辐射暴露较少。荟萃分析显示,TCAR 组卒 中的风险明显低于 TFCAS 组(OR 0.63;95%CI 0.47-0.85)。TIA 和 MI 无显著差异。与 CEA 相比,TCAR 具有更短的手术时间、更低的 CNI 风险和更少的出血量。在老年患者中,TCAR 的效果明显优于 TFCAS。

结论

与 TFCAS 相比,TCAR 围手术期卒 中的风险较低。与 CEA 相比,TCAR 还具有更短的手术时间、更低的 CNI 风险和更少的出血量。除了 TFCAS 和 CEA,TCAR 可能是一种有前途的治疗选择。