Fan Weijian, Shi Weihao, Lu Shuangshuang, Guo Wencheng, Tong Jindong, Tan Jinyun, Yu Bo
Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan Zhangjiang Institute, Shanghai, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 6;9:1045598. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1045598. eCollection 2022.
Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is thought to be a promising technique and instrument for treating carotid stenosis with favorable outcomes. Since there remain several differences in anatomic characteristics among races, this study was conducted to investigate the anatomic eligibility of TCAR in Chinese patients who underwent carotid revascularization.
A retrospective review of patients with carotid stenosis from 2019 to 2021 was conducted. The anatomic eligibility of TCAR was based on the instruction of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System. The carotid artery characteristics and configuration of the circle of Willis (CoW) were evaluated by CT angiography. The demographic and clinical characteristics and procedure-related complications were recorded. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent factors for TCAR eligibility.
Of 289 consecutive patients [222 for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and 67 for transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS)] identified, a total of 215 patients (74.4%) met TCAR anatomic eligibility. Specifically, 83.7% had mild common carotid artery (CCA) puncture site plaque, 95.2% had 4-9 mm internal carotid artery diameters, 95.8% had >6 mm CCA diameter, and 98.3% had >5 cm clavicle to carotid bifurcation distance. Those who were female (OR, 5.967; 95% CI: 2.545-13.987; < 0.001), were of an older age (OR, 1.226; 95% CI: 1.157-1.299; < 0.001), and higher body mass index (OR, 1.462; 95% CI: 1.260-1.697; < 0.001) were prone to be associated with TCAR ineligibility. In addition, 71 patients with TCAR eligibility (33.0%) were found to combine with incomplete CoW. A high risk for CEA was found in 29 patients (17.3%) with TCAR eligibility, and a high risk for TF-CAS was noted in nine patients (19.1%) with TCAR eligibility. Overall, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was found in 22 patients after CEA, while 19 of them (11.3%) met TCAR eligibility.
A significant proportion of Chinese patients meet the anatomic criteria of TCAR, making TCAR a feasible treatment option in China. Anatomic and some demographic factors play key roles in TCAR eligibility. Further analysis indicates a potential reduction of procedure-related complications in patients with high-risk carotid stenosis under the TCAR procedure.
经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)被认为是一种有前景的治疗颈动脉狭窄的技术和手段,疗效良好。由于不同种族的解剖特征存在一些差异,本研究旨在调查接受颈动脉血管重建术的中国患者中TCAR的解剖学适宜性。
对2019年至2021年的颈动脉狭窄患者进行回顾性研究。TCAR的解剖学适宜性依据ENROUTE经颈动脉神经保护系统的说明。通过CT血管造影评估颈动脉特征和 Willis 环(CoW)的形态。记录人口统计学和临床特征以及与手术相关的并发症。采用逻辑回归分析TCAR适宜性的独立因素。
在连续纳入的289例患者中[222例行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),67例行经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(TF-CAS)],共有215例患者(74.4%)符合TCAR解剖学适宜性标准。具体而言,83.7%的患者颈总动脉(CCA)穿刺部位有轻度斑块,95.2%的患者颈内动脉直径为4 - 9 mm,95.8%的患者CCA直径>6 mm,98.3%的患者锁骨至颈动脉分叉距离>5 cm。女性(OR,5.967;95%CI:2.545 - 13.987;P<0.001)、年龄较大(OR,1.226;95%CI:1.157 - 1.299;P<0.001)和体重指数较高(OR,1.462;95%CI:1.260 - 1.697;P<0.001)的患者更容易不符合TCAR标准。此外,71例符合TCAR标准的患者(33.0%)被发现合并CoW不完整。29例符合TCAR标准的患者(17.3%)行CEA的风险较高,9例符合TCAR标准的患者(19.1%)行TF-CAS的风险较高。总体而言,22例患者在CEA后出现颅神经损伤(CNI),其中19例(11.3%)符合TCAR标准。
相当一部分中国患者符合TCAR的解剖学标准,使TCAR在中国成为一种可行的治疗选择。解剖学和一些人口统计学因素在TCAR适宜性中起关键作用。进一步分析表明,在TCAR手术中,高危颈动脉狭窄患者与手术相关的并发症可能会减少。