Sharpe Patricia A, Liese Angela D, Bell Bethany A, Wilcox Sara, Hutto Brent E, Stucker Jessica
Research Professor, Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Prevention Research Center, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC, 29208.
Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 915 Greene Street, Room 461, Columbia, SC 29208.
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2018;13(4):482-496. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2017.1364188. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Food insecurity exceeds the 14% national level in severely disadvantaged households, and food shoppers seek food sources and assistance. In 513 predominantly African American households in South Carolina, USA, food security was a significant predictor of sources used, adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics (least-squares means = high food security, 2.10; marginal, 2.96; low, 2.91; very low, 3.40). The top sources were churches/social services, food bank/pantry, farmers' market, family/friend/neighbor, soup kitchen/shelter, and hunting/fishing/trapping. Adjusted odds were significantly greater among households of lower food security levels compared to high food security for food from church/social services, food bank/pantry, family/friend/neighbors, soup kitchen/shelter, and community/school/church garden.
在极度贫困的家庭中,粮食不安全状况超过了14%的国家水平,食品购买者在寻找食物来源并寻求援助。在美国南卡罗来纳州的513户主要为非裔美国家庭中,在对社会人口特征进行调整后,粮食安全状况是所使用食物来源的一个重要预测指标(最小二乘均值:高粮食安全水平为2.10;边缘水平为2.96;低水平为2.91;极低水平为3.40)。主要的食物来源包括教堂/社会服务机构、食品银行/食品储藏室、农贸市场、家人/朋友/邻居、施粥处/收容所,以及狩猎/捕鱼/诱捕。与高粮食安全水平的家庭相比,粮食安全水平较低的家庭从教堂/社会服务机构、食品银行/食品储藏室、家人/朋友/邻居、施粥处/收容所,以及社区/学校/教堂菜园获取食物的调整后几率显著更高。