1 West Palm Beach VA Medical Center, FL, USA.
2 Boise VA Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Aug;53(8):806-811. doi: 10.1177/1060028019835843. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
The optimal monitoring and follow-up strategy for long-term direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy has not been established. Historically, at our medical center, DOAC patients were referred to a clinical pharmacy specialist managed anticoagulation clinic (AC) for monitoring via regularly scheduled encounters (face-to-face or telephone). To determine if implementation of a DOAC Population Management Tool (PMT) designed to identify patients who most likely require clinical review and possibly intervention, would improve the efficacy (interventions per patient) and efficiency (time invested to generate an intervention) of monitoring over AC practices. The DOAC PMT group included patients flagged as potentially having a dosing issue or history of valve replacement. The AC group included patients who were scheduled for routine DOAC follow-up. The quantity and character of interventions made were prospectively recorded and compared. A total of 399 patients were included. Data were collected for 131 patients identified by the DOAC PMT, resulting in a review of 170 flags with a total of 94 interventions or 0.55 interventions per flag reviewed. For the AC group, 268 patients were evaluated, leading to 53 interventions or 0.20 interventions per patient encounter ( < 0.001 for comparison). The time to generate an intervention was 16 minutes in the DOAC PMT versus 64 minutes for the AC group. A population-based approach to DOAC monitoring represents a more effective and efficient strategy to reduce missed opportunities for interventions between follow-up appointments while also increasing clinic access, particularly for patients who require immediate attention.
长期直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 治疗的最佳监测和随访策略尚未确定。在我们的医疗中心,历史上 DOAC 患者会被转介到临床药剂师管理的抗凝门诊 (AC) 进行监测,通过定期预约(面对面或电话)。为了确定是否实施一种旨在确定最需要临床审查和可能干预的患者的 DOAC 人群管理工具 (PMT),是否会提高监测的疗效(每个患者的干预次数)和效率(产生干预所需的时间)超过 AC 实践。DOAC PMT 组包括被标记为可能存在剂量问题或瓣膜置换史的患者。AC 组包括计划进行常规 DOAC 随访的患者。前瞻性记录和比较了进行的干预数量和性质。共纳入 399 名患者。收集了 131 名患者的 DOAC PMT 数据,共审查了 170 个标记,共有 94 次干预或每个标记审查 0.55 次干预。对于 AC 组,评估了 268 名患者,导致 53 次干预或每次患者就诊 0.20 次干预(比较差异 < 0.001)。生成干预的时间在 DOAC PMT 中为 16 分钟,而在 AC 组中为 64 分钟。基于人群的 DOAC 监测方法是一种更有效和高效的策略,可以减少随访预约之间错过干预机会的情况,同时增加诊所的就诊机会,特别是对于需要立即关注的患者。