Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂门诊管理实践的范围综述

A scoping review of direct oral anticoagulant ambulatory management practices.

作者信息

Mangrum Jasmine S, Saunders John A, Chaiyakunapruk Nathorn, Witt Daniel M, King Jordan B

机构信息

University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA, USA.

Clinical Practice, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, South Campus Center | 1601 NE Columbia Rd, Suite 246A, Seattle, WA, 98195-7631, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 May;55(4):700-709. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02794-x. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

Abstract

Models of care for managing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy are evolving. Little is known of what services are provided by anticoagulation managements services (AMS) for DOACs, or what necessitates comprehensive DOAC management and what differentiates it from usual care. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe services, management, or monitoring of DOACs distinct from prescriber-managed or usual care of DOACs. This scoping review reported followed the 2018 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE from inception to November 2020 to identify articles of interest. No language restriction was applied. Articles were included if they provided a description of DOAC management services, and described longitudinal anticoagulation follow-up that occurred in ambulatory care, community, or outpatient-related settings. Data was extracted from a total of 23 articles. The specific types of DOAC management interventions provided varied across the included studies. Nearly all studies described some form of DOAC therapy appropriateness assessment. Other common interventions included assessments of DOAC therapy compliance, adverse event triage and management, assessment of DOAC dosing appropriateness, periprocedural management of DOAC therapy, educational interventions, and renal function monitoring. A variety of DOAC management interventions were identified, but additional studies are needed to help health systems decide whether specific interventions performed by dedicated services are preferred over the usual care provided by clinicians prescribing DOAC therapy.

摘要

直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)治疗的管理模式正在不断发展。对于抗凝管理服务(AMS)为DOAC提供哪些服务,或者全面的DOAC管理需要什么以及它与常规护理有何不同,人们知之甚少。本范围综述的目的是描述与处方医生管理的DOAC或常规护理不同的DOAC服务、管理或监测。本范围综述遵循2018年系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)。我们检索了从创刊到2020年11月的PubMed、CINAHL和EMBASE,以识别感兴趣的文章。未应用语言限制。如果文章提供了DOAC管理服务的描述,并描述了在门诊护理、社区或门诊相关环境中进行的纵向抗凝随访,则纳入这些文章。共从23篇文章中提取了数据。纳入的研究中提供的DOAC管理干预的具体类型各不相同。几乎所有研究都描述了某种形式的DOAC治疗适宜性评估。其他常见干预措施包括评估DOAC治疗依从性、不良事件分类与管理、评估DOAC剂量适宜性、DOAC治疗的围手术期管理、教育干预以及肾功能监测。已确定了多种DOAC管理干预措施,但还需要更多研究来帮助卫生系统决定,由专门服务进行的特定干预是否比开具DOAC治疗的临床医生提供的常规护理更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验