Suppr超能文献

应用潜在类别分析比较 6 种用于诊断腕管综合征的检测方法

A Comparison of 6 Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis.

机构信息

Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2020 Nov;15(6):776-779. doi: 10.1177/1558944719833709. Epub 2019 Mar 10.

Abstract

Nerve conduction studies (NCS), ultrasonography (US), Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6), Wainner, Lo, and Kamath are clinical diagnostic tools that can be used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Latent class analysis (LCA) is a proven statistical technique that can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests in a lack of a reference standard. Given that there is no accepted reference standard, we elected to perform an LCA to evaluate the 6 clinical diagnostic tests. One hundred eighty-seven wrists were prospectively evaluated by a board-certified hand surgeon using US, the CTS-6, Wainner, Lo, and Kamath. The NCS were performed by an electrophysiologist according to the standards of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. The LCA was performed to evaluate individual performance and pairwise combinations of the tests. The NCS demonstrated the highest estimated sensitivity of 97%, and the Wainner had the highest estimated specificity of 97%. Alternatively, the Lo had the lowest estimated sensitivity (36%), and NCS had the lowest estimated specificity (40%). When evaluating pairwise combinations, positive US and NCS demonstrated the highest overall sensitivity at 86%, and negative US and NCS had a specificity of 83%. There is no perfect clinical diagnostic test, with the 6 clinical diagnostic tests having differing sensitivities and specificities. Pairwise combinations of the test can be used to complement one another.

摘要

神经传导研究(NCS)、超声检查(US)、腕管综合征 6 项(CTS-6)、Wainner、Lo 和 Kamath 是可用于诊断腕管综合征(CTS)的临床诊断工具。潜在类别分析(LCA)是一种经过验证的统计技术,可用于在缺乏参考标准的情况下评估诊断测试。鉴于没有公认的参考标准,我们选择进行 LCA 来评估这 6 种临床诊断测试。187 只手腕由经过董事会认证的手外科医生使用 US、CTS-6、Wainner、Lo 和 Kamath 进行前瞻性评估。NCS 由电生理学家根据美国神经肌肉与电诊断医学协会的标准进行。LCA 用于评估测试的个体表现和两两组合。NCS 表现出最高的估计敏感性为 97%,Wainner 具有最高的估计特异性为 97%。另一方面,Lo 的估计敏感性最低(36%),NCS 的估计特异性最低(40%)。在评估两两组合时,阳性 US 和 NCS 的总体敏感性最高,为 86%,阴性 US 和 NCS 的特异性为 83%。没有完美的临床诊断测试,这 6 种临床诊断测试具有不同的敏感性和特异性。测试的两两组合可以相互补充。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of 6 Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis.
Hand (N Y). 2020 Nov;15(6):776-779. doi: 10.1177/1558944719833709. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
2
A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Tools for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Sep;43(9):833-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
A Comparison of Three Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1958-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00476.
4
Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Electrodiagnostic Testing and Ultrasonography for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Hand (N Y). 2023 May;18(3):407-412. doi: 10.1177/15589447211038701. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: old tests-new concepts.
Joint Bone Spine. 2008 Jul;75(4):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.09.014. Epub 2008 May 2.
8
Sonographic differences in carpal tunnel syndrome with normal and abnormal nerve conduction studies.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;34:77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
The diagnostic value of ultrasound compared with nerve conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;17(6):612-20. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12310. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the diagnostic utility of the flexion-compression test for carpal tunnel syndrome.
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Nov 8;17(1):100172. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100172. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
The Diagnostic Utility of Ultrasound and Electrodiagnostic Studies in The Young and Old.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Mar 16;6(3):323-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.008. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Carpal tunnel syndrome.
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 May 23;10(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00521-1.
4
Sonographic reference values for median nerve cross-sectional area: A meta-analysis of data from healthy individuals.
J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2023 Sep;39(5):492-506. doi: 10.1177/87564793231176009. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Ultrasound Measurement Error and Its Implications for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis.
Hand (N Y). 2022 Jul;17(4):635-638. doi: 10.1177/1558944720944258. Epub 2020 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Tools for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Sep;43(9):833-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
A Survey of the Use of Ultrasound by Upper Extremity Surgeons.
Hand (N Y). 2017 Jan;12(1):31-38. doi: 10.1177/1558944716646779. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
A Comparison of Three Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1958-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00476.
6
Predictors of fracture following suspected injury to the scaphoid.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jul;94(7):961-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.28704.
7
Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Oct;44(4):597-607. doi: 10.1002/mus.22208.
8
The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1089-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
9
Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review.
Neurol Sci. 2010 Jun;31(3):243-52. doi: 10.1007/s10072-009-0213-9. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
10
Identifiability of models for multiple diagnostic testing in the absence of a gold standard.
Biometrics. 2010 Sep;66(3):855-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01330.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验