Suppr超能文献

无腕管综合征临床体征和症状患者的神经传导研究及超声检查的假阳性率

False-Positive Rates for Nerve Conduction Studies and Ultrasound in Patients Without Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

作者信息

Fowler John R, Byrne Kevin, Pan Tiffany, Goitz Robert J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Mar;44(3):181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine the rate of false positives for nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and ultrasound (US) in a population without signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using a CTS-6 score of 0 as the reference standard.

METHODS

Patients were included in this study if they were referred for NCSs for a reason other than CTS (cubital tunnel syndrome and/or cervical radiculopathy) and they had a CTS-6 score of 0. An US measurement of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel inlet was performed by a certified ultrasound technician. An a priori CSA cutoff of 10 mm or greater measured using US at the carpal tunnel inlet qualified as a positive diagnosis. The NCSs were performed and interpreted according to national standards by a certified electrodiagnostician. All patients in this study were considered to not have a diagnosis of CTS based on the CTS-6 of 0.

RESULTS

Forty hands with a CTS-6 of 0 were included in this study. The US was positive in 9 of 40(23%) and NCS was positive in 17 of 40 (43%). There were only 2 patients with a false-positive US that did not also have a positive NCS. However, there were 11 patients who had a false-positive NCS that did not have a positive US.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective cohort series has demonstrated that US has a lower false-positive rate than NCSs in asymptomatic patients as measured by the CTS-6 diagnostic tool. Studies with a low false-positive rate are preferred when ordering a confirmatory diagnostic test. Therefore, if a confirmatory diagnostic test is desired, we recommend that US be used rather than NCSs.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在以CTS-6评分为0作为参考标准,确定在无腕管综合征(CTS)体征和症状的人群中神经传导研究(NCS)和超声(US)的假阳性率。

方法

如果患者因CTS以外的原因(肘管综合征和/或颈椎病)被转诊进行NCS,且CTS-6评分为0,则纳入本研究。由经过认证的超声技术人员在腕管入口水平对正中神经的横截面积(CSA)进行超声测量。使用超声在腕管入口处测量的先验CSA截断值为10mm或更大被判定为阳性诊断。NCS由经过认证的电诊断医生根据国家标准进行操作和解读。根据CTS-6评分为0,本研究中的所有患者均被认为未诊断为CTS。

结果

本研究纳入了40只CTS-6评分为0的手。超声检查中40例中有9例(23%)为阳性,神经传导研究中40例中有17例(43%)为阳性。只有2例超声假阳性患者神经传导研究结果未呈阳性。然而,有11例神经传导研究假阳性患者超声检查结果未呈阳性。

结论

这个前瞻性队列系列研究表明,通过CTS-6诊断工具测量,在无症状患者中,超声检查假阳性率低于神经传导研究。在进行确诊诊断测试时,首选假阳性率低的研究。因此,如果需要进行确诊诊断测试,我们建议使用超声检查而非神经传导研究。

研究类型/证据水平:诊断性II级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验