Department of Orthopaedics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1958-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00476.
The current reference standard for carpal tunnel syndrome is under debate. Recent studies have demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy between ultrasound and nerve conduction studies. The purpose of the present study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, nerve conduction studies, and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6) for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis.
Latent class analysis is a statistical technique that can be used to estimate the accuracy of diagnosis when there is no universally accepted reference standard. This type of analysis is useful in the setting of carpal tunnel syndrome as there remains substantial controversy with respect to the necessity of nerve conduction studies and other confirmatory testing. CTS-6 is a validated clinical diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome that has been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity. Data from a database on the cases of eighty-five consecutive patients who had had nerve conduction studies, CTS-6, and ultrasound were analyzed using classical latent class analysis, assuming that the three tests were imperfect and conditionally independent.
The sensitivities of ultrasound, CTS-6, and nerve conduction studies were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81% to 98%), 95% (95% CI, 86% to 99%), and 91% (95% CI, 81% to 97%), respectively. The specificities of ultrasound, CTS-6, and nerve conduction studies were 94% (95% CI, 80% to 100%), 91% (95% CI, 74% to 99%), and 83% (95% CI, 66% to 95%), respectively.
Ultrasound, nerve conduction studies, and CTS-6 have similar sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. The currently accepted reference standard (nerve conduction studies) had the lowest sensitivity and specificity of the three tests. These findings support previous studies that have suggested that CTS-6 and ultrasound are highly accurate in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and that nerve conduction studies are not necessary in most cases.
目前对腕管综合征的参考标准存在争议。最近的研究表明,超声和神经传导研究的诊断准确性相似。本研究旨在使用潜在类别分析确定超声、神经传导研究和腕管综合征 6 (CTS-6)对腕管综合征的诊断的灵敏度和特异性。
潜在类别分析是一种统计技术,当没有普遍接受的参考标准时,可以用于估计诊断的准确性。这种分析在腕管综合征的情况下非常有用,因为神经传导研究和其他确认性测试的必要性仍然存在很大争议。CTS-6 是一种经过验证的临床诊断工具,用于诊断腕管综合征,具有很高的灵敏度和特异性。对来自数据库的 85 例连续患者的神经传导研究、CTS-6 和超声数据进行了分析,使用经典潜在类别分析,假设三种测试均不完美且条件独立。
超声、CTS-6 和神经传导研究的灵敏度分别为 91%(95%置信区间 [CI],81%至 98%)、95%(95%CI,86%至 99%)和 91%(95%CI,81%至 97%)。超声、CTS-6 和神经传导研究的特异性分别为 94%(95%CI,80%至 100%)、91%(95%CI,74%至 99%)和 83%(95%CI,66%至 95%)。
超声、神经传导研究和 CTS-6 对腕管综合征的诊断具有相似的灵敏度和特异性。目前接受的参考标准(神经传导研究)是这三种测试中灵敏度和特异性最低的。这些发现支持了之前的研究,即 CTS-6 和超声在诊断腕管综合征方面非常准确,并且在大多数情况下不需要神经传导研究。