• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察塞拉利昂产妇和生殖健康干预措施利用方面机会不平等的情况。

Examining inequality of opportunity in the use of maternal and reproductive health interventions in Sierra Leone.

机构信息

Department of Statistics & Population Studies, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 May 26;42(2):254-261. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz023.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdz023
PMID:30855685
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor countries, such as Sierra Leone, often have poor health outcomes, whereby the majority of the population cannot access lifesaving health services. Access to, and use of, maternal and reproductive health services is crucial for human development, especially in developing regions. However, inequality remains a persistent problem for many developing countries. Moreover, we have not found empirical studies, which have examined inequalities in maternal and reproductive health in Sierra Leone.

METHOD

We used data collected from the Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in 2008 and 2013. Five maternal and reproductive health indicators were selected for this study, including four or more antenatal care visits, skilled antenatal care provider, births delivered in a facility, births assisted by a skilled birth attendant, and any method of contraception. To measure inequalities, we adopted the Human Opportunity Index (HOI). Using this measure, we measured differentials over the two periods, and decomposed it to measure the contribution of the selected circumstance variables to inequality.

RESULTS

Inequalities declined over time, as shown by the decrease in the dissimilarity index. Due to the drop in the dissimilarity index, the HOI increased for all the selected maternal and reproductive health indicators. Moreover, antenatal services were closer to equality compared to the other selected services. Overall, we found that household wealth status, maternal education and place of residence, are the most important factors contributing to the inequality in the use of maternal and reproductive health services.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though there are improvements in inequalities over time, there are variations in the way in which inequality within the different indicators has improved. In order to improve the use of maternal and reproductive health services, and to reduce inequalities in these services, the government will have to invest in: (i) increasing the educational levels of women, (ii) improving the standard of living, as well as (iii) bringing maternal and reproductive health services closer to rural populations.

摘要

背景

贫穷国家,如塞拉利昂,通常医疗服务质量较差,多数人无法获得救命的医疗服务。获取和使用孕产妇和生殖健康服务对人类发展至关重要,尤其是在发展中地区。然而,不平等仍然是许多发展中国家的一个长期问题。此外,我们尚未发现研究塞拉利昂孕产妇和生殖健康不平等的实证研究。

方法

我们使用了 2008 年和 2013 年塞拉利昂人口与健康调查(DHS)收集的数据。本研究选择了四个孕产妇和生殖健康指标,包括四次或更多次产前检查、有熟练接生人员的产前护理、在医疗机构分娩、由熟练接生人员协助分娩和任何避孕方法。为了衡量不平等,我们采用了人类机会指数(HOI)。利用这一衡量标准,我们在两个时期衡量了差异,并将其分解以衡量所选环境变量对不平等的贡献。

结果

不平等程度随时间下降,表现在不相似指数下降。由于不相似指数下降,所有选定的孕产妇和生殖健康指标的 HOI 都有所增加。此外,与其他选定的服务相比,产前服务更接近平等。总的来说,我们发现家庭财富状况、母亲教育程度和居住地是导致孕产妇和生殖健康服务利用不平等的最重要因素。

结论

尽管不平等程度随时间有所改善,但不同指标内不平等程度的改善方式存在差异。为了改善孕产妇和生殖健康服务的利用,减少这些服务中的不平等,政府将不得不投资:(i)提高妇女的教育水平,(ii)提高生活水平,以及(iii)使孕产妇和生殖健康服务更接近农村人口。

相似文献

1
Examining inequality of opportunity in the use of maternal and reproductive health interventions in Sierra Leone.考察塞拉利昂产妇和生殖健康干预措施利用方面机会不平等的情况。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 May 26;42(2):254-261. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz023.
2
Inequalities in maternal healthcare use in Sierra Leone: Evidence from the 2008-2019 Demographic and Health Surveys.塞拉利昂产妇保健利用方面的不平等:来自 2008-2019 年人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0276102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276102. eCollection 2022.
3
Measurement and analysis of inequality of opportunity in access of maternal and child health care in Togo.多哥孕产妇和儿童保健服务获取机会不平等的测量与分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 4;17(Suppl 2):699. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2647-8.
4
Inequalities in adequate maternal healthcare opportunities: evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018.孕产妇获得适当医疗保健机会的不平等:来自 2017-2018 年孟加拉国人口与健康调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):e070111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070111.
5
Changes in Inequality in Use of Maternal Health Care Services: Evidence from Skilled Birth Attendance in Mauritania for the Period 2007-2015.孕产妇保健服务利用不平等的变化:来自 2007-2015 年毛里塔尼亚熟练接生的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063566.
6
Access to health care, reproductive health and disability: a large scale survey in Sierra Leone.获取医疗保健、生殖健康和残疾服务的机会:塞拉利昂的一项大规模调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1477-89. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.040. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
7
Wealth-based inequality in the continuum of maternal health service utilisation in 16 sub-Saharan African countries.16 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家孕产妇卫生服务利用连续体中的基于财富的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 2;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02015-0.
8
Demographic and economic inequality of antenatal care coverage in 4 African countries with a high maternal mortality rate.4个孕产妇死亡率高的非洲国家产前保健覆盖率的人口和经济不平等状况。
Arch Public Health. 2024 May 6;82(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01288-3.
9
How do we reach the girls and women who are the hardest to reach? Inequitable opportunities in reproductive and maternal health care services in armed conflict and forced displacement settings in Colombia.我们如何接触到最难接触到的女孩和妇女?哥伦比亚武装冲突和被迫流离失所情况下生殖和孕产妇保健服务中的机会不平等问题。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 18;13(1):e0188654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188654. eCollection 2018.
10
Socio-economic disadvantage and quality Antenatal Care (ANC) in Sierra Leone: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey.社会经济劣势与塞拉利昂优质产前护理(ANC):来自人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 12;18(1):e0280061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280061. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequalities in adequate maternal healthcare opportunities: evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018.孕产妇获得适当医疗保健机会的不平等:来自 2017-2018 年孟加拉国人口与健康调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):e070111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070111.
2
Inequalities in maternal healthcare use in Sierra Leone: Evidence from the 2008-2019 Demographic and Health Surveys.塞拉利昂产妇保健利用方面的不平等:来自 2008-2019 年人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0276102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276102. eCollection 2022.
3
Trends and factors associated with the utilisation of antenatal care services during the Millennium Development Goals era in Tanzania.
坦桑尼亚千年发展目标时代与产前护理服务利用相关的趋势和因素。
Trop Med Health. 2020 Jun 3;48:38. doi: 10.1186/s41182-020-00226-7. eCollection 2020.