Alvarez-Perez Marian G, Garcia-Murillo Mario A, Cervantes-Sánchez J Jesús
Mechanical Engineering Department, DICIS, University of Guanajuato, Salamanca, Mexico GTO.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 May;15(4):394-408. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1578424. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
The aim of this review paper is to summarize recent developments and research in robotics, relevant to the field of ankle rehabilitation, to overview new findings and determine the actual state of the art. The literature search was performed using scientific and medical databases (Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science) and other websites related to robots used in the area of ankle rehabilitation, analysing studies from 1950s to present. Information about the mechanical and kinematic specifications, actuation and stage of development was extracted from the selected literature. Several types of rehabilitation robots have been considered, and they were classified depending on their architecture and design features. We we found that, regardless of the differences in architectures, only a few of them have been commercialized. The majority of rehabilitation robots designs allows plantarflexion-dorsiflexion movements. Unless some exceptions, most of the wearable robots do not allow the adduction-abduction movement. Neither the physical appearance of the robot nor the user's perception towards it has not regularly been taken into account in the design stage. This limits the possibility of successful commercialization. Up to the present moment, the main challenges in the field of robot rehabilitation are the lack of unique rehabilitation protocols capable to fulfil the needs of all types of patients and the additional resources to measure the effectiveness of proposals that have not yet been commercialized. Nonetheless, we have mentioned above three areas were the challenges in design are more pressing. The first one is the robot architecture, which still presents some incommodities nowadays to emulate the ankle joint movement in a natural way. Thus, the displacements experienced by the axes in the joint must be adaptable to each patient and a wide range of pathologies. Moreover, many proposals are not been conceived to the purpose of commercialization, and even less to become an object of personal use.Implications for rehabilitationThis review states that the use of robotic devices for ankle rehabilitation is a consolidated paradigm in the ankle's rehabilitation.Platform-based robots allow to do complex and specialized spatial movements and these architectures endow the device with high stiffness, a balanced force distribution and better adaptability to the mechanical properties of human ankle joints. Unless some exceptions, most of the wearable robots do not allow the adduction-abduction movement.For a full integration of these technologies in the ankle's rehabilitation field, more clinical evaluations are needed.Regardless of the potential of robotic devices in rehabilitation, only a few of them have been commercialized.
本综述论文旨在总结机器人技术在踝关节康复领域的最新进展和研究,概述新发现并确定当前的技术现状。使用科学和医学数据库(Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science)以及其他与踝关节康复领域使用的机器人相关的网站进行文献检索,分析了从20世纪50年代至今的研究。从选定的文献中提取了有关机械和运动学规格、驱动方式和发展阶段的信息。考虑了几种类型的康复机器人,并根据其架构和设计特点进行了分类。我们发现,尽管架构存在差异,但只有少数已商业化。大多数康复机器人设计允许跖屈-背屈运动。除了一些例外情况,大多数可穿戴机器人不允许内收-外展运动。在设计阶段,机器人的外观和用户对它的认知通常都没有被考虑进去。这限制了成功商业化的可能性。到目前为止,机器人康复领域的主要挑战是缺乏能够满足所有类型患者需求的独特康复方案,以及用于衡量尚未商业化的方案有效性的额外资源。尽管如此,我们提到了上述三个设计挑战更为紧迫的领域。第一个是机器人架构,如今它在以自然方式模拟踝关节运动方面仍然存在一些不便之处。因此,关节中轴的位移必须适应每个患者和广泛的病理情况。此外,许多方案并非为商业化目的而设计,更不用说成为个人使用的物品了。
对康复的影响
本综述指出,使用机器人设备进行踝关节康复是踝关节康复中一种成熟的模式。基于平台的机器人能够进行复杂和专门的空间运动,这些架构赋予设备高刚度、平衡的力分布以及对人体踝关节力学特性更好的适应性。除了一些例外情况,大多数可穿戴机器人不允许内收-外展运动。
为了使这些技术在踝关节康复领域完全整合,需要更多的临床评估。
尽管机器人设备在康复方面具有潜力,但只有少数已商业化。