Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
Plant Dis. 2019 May;103(5):790. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-18-1468-LTE. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
A recent Feature article, "Turning a Blind Eye to Ratoon Stunting Disease of Sugarcane in Australia" by Dr. Anthony J. Young, claims "The potential RSD plays a significant, industry-wide role in reduced yields and crop deterioration in Australia has been widely overlooked." As a result, "the industry has exhibited what amounts to an ideological attitude, repeatedly claiming the disease is economically managed." These statements are the basis for the provocative title of the article. Dr. Young presents very elaborately constructed arguments that conclude RSD is likely to be more widespread than realized, is causing significant yield losses and loss of varieties, and is the unrecognized cause of multiple yield decline problems. His overall contention is that the RSD situation has been mismanaged to the detriment of the industry. Allegations such as these should be supported by well documented, direct evidence. Are they supported by solid evidence?
最近的一篇特写文章,“澳大利亚甘蔗宿根矮化病视而不见”,作者安东尼 J. 杨博士声称“潜在的 RSD 在澳大利亚的减产和作物恶化方面起着重要的、全行业范围的作用,这一作用被广泛忽视了。”因此,“该行业表现出了一种意识形态的态度,一再声称该疾病在经济上是可控的。”这些说法是文章颇具挑衅性标题的基础。杨博士提出了非常精心构建的论点,这些论点的结论是 RSD 可能比人们意识到的更为普遍,正在导致显著的产量损失和品种丧失,而且是多种减产问题未被识别的原因。他的总体论点是,RSD 情况被管理不善,对该行业造成了损害。这样的指控应该有文件记录的直接证据来支持。这些指控有确凿的证据支持吗?