Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
Caudal epidural blockade in children is one of the most widely administered techniques of regional anaesthesia. Recent clinical studies have answered major pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic questions, thus providing the scientific background for safe and effective blocks in daily clinical practice and demonstrating that patient selection can be expanded to range from extreme preterm births up to 50 kg of body weight. This narrative review discusses the main findings in the current literature with regard to patient selection (sub-umbilical vs mid-abdominal indications, contraindications, low-risk patients with spinal anomalies); anatomical considerations (access problems, age and body positioning, palpation for needle insertion); technical considerations (verification of needle position by ultrasound vs landmarks vs 'whoosh' or 'swoosh' testing); training and equipment requirements (learning curve, needle types, risk of tissue spreading); complications and safety (paediatric regional anaesthesia, caudal blocks); local anaesthetics (bupivacaine vs ropivacaine, risk of toxicity in children, management of toxic events); adjuvant drugs (clonidine, dexmedetomidine, opioids, ketamine); volume dosing (dermatomal reach, cranial rebound); caudally accessed lumbar or thoracic anaesthesia (contamination risk, verifying catheter placement); and postoperative pain. Caudal blocks are an efficient way to offer perioperative analgesia for painful sub-umbilical interventions. Performed on sedated children, they enable not only early ambulation, but also periprocedural haemodynamic stability and spontaneous breathing in patient groups at maximum risk of a difficult airway. These are important advantages over general anaesthesia, notably in preterm babies and in children with cardiopulmonary co-morbidities. Compared with other techniques of regional anaesthesia, a case for caudal blocks can still be made.
小儿骶管阻滞是最广泛应用的区域麻醉技术之一。最近的临床研究回答了主要的药效学和药代动力学问题,为日常临床实践中安全有效的阻滞提供了科学依据,并证明可以扩大患者选择范围,从极早产儿到 50 公斤体重的儿童。本文综述了当前文献中关于患者选择(脐下与中腹部适应证、禁忌证、脊柱畸形低危患者)、解剖学考虑因素(进针困难、年龄和体位、针插入时的触诊)、技术考虑因素(超声与体表标志定位、“嗖”声或“呼”声测试验证针位置)、培训和设备要求(学习曲线、针类型、组织扩散风险)、并发症和安全性(小儿区域麻醉、骶管阻滞)、局部麻醉药(布比卡因与罗哌卡因、儿童中毒风险、中毒事件的处理)、辅助药物(可乐定、右美托咪定、阿片类药物、氯胺酮)、容量剂量(皮节范围、颅反射)、骶部腰椎或胸椎麻醉(污染风险、验证导管位置)和术后疼痛的主要发现。骶管阻滞是为脐下疼痛性操作提供围手术期镇痛的有效方法。在镇静患儿中进行,不仅可以实现早期活动,而且在气道困难风险最大的患者群体中,还可以实现围手术期血流动力学稳定和自主呼吸,这是全麻的重要优势,特别是在早产儿和心肺合并症患儿中。与其他区域麻醉技术相比,骶管阻滞仍有其优势。