• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水涨船高?先进工业社会的自由化与实际收入

Does a rising tide lift all boats? Liberalization and real incomes in advanced industrial societies.

机构信息

University of La Verne, United States.

University of La Verne, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2019 Mar;79:127-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.006
PMID:30857658
Abstract

Many scholars argue that liberalization increases both economic growth and income inequality in developed economies. However, there is limited research on how liberal economic policies shape the earnings of different income groups in the national economy. The current study thus attempts to fill this gap in the literature by examining a panel dataset of 15 advanced industrial societies during the years 1970-2010. According to the results, long-run measures of liberalization increase the incomes of the top 0.1%, but does not return significant results for the incomes of the top 1.0% and top 10%. Furthermore, no discernible effect of liberalization is observed for the incomes of the bottom 90%. When taken together, although most researchers focus on inter-group inequality by examining how liberalization augments the incomes of top earners vis-à-vis bottom earners, the evidence of this study indicates scholars should also focus on intra-group inequality among top earners, as liberalization seems to benefit only a very small segment of elite earners in the national economy.

摘要

许多学者认为,自由化会在发达经济体中同时提高经济增长和收入不平等。然而,关于自由经济政策如何塑造国民经济中不同收入群体的收入,相关研究还很有限。因此,本研究试图通过考察 1970 年至 2010 年期间 15 个先进工业社会的面板数据集来填补这一文献空白。根据研究结果,长期的自由化措施提高了前 0.1%人群的收入,但对前 1.0%和前 10%人群的收入没有显著影响。此外,自由化对底层 90%人群的收入没有明显影响。总之,尽管大多数研究人员通过考察自由化如何提高高收入者相对于低收入者的收入来关注群体间不平等,但本研究的证据表明,学者们也应该关注高收入者内部的不平等,因为自由化似乎只使国民经济中非常小的一部分精英收入者受益。

相似文献

1
Does a rising tide lift all boats? Liberalization and real incomes in advanced industrial societies.水涨船高?先进工业社会的自由化与实际收入
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Mar;79:127-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
3
The knowledge-based products and economic complexity in developing countries.发展中国家基于知识的产品与经济复杂性。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 18;5(12):e02979. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02979. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Egalitarian motives in humans.人类的平等主义动机。
Nature. 2007 Apr 12;446(7137):794-6. doi: 10.1038/nature05651.
5
Rising mean incomes for whom?收入增长惠及谁?
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0242803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242803. eCollection 2020.
6
Political democracy, economic liberalization, and macro-sociological models of intergenerational mobility.政治民主、经济自由化与代际流动的宏观社会学模式。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Aug;66:58-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
Political economy and population health: is Australia exceptional?政治经济学与人口健康:澳大利亚是否例外?
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2006 Jun 1;3:6. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-3-6.
8
Trends in the economic status of the elderly, 1976-2000.1976 - 2000年老年人经济状况趋势
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(3):12-22.
9
Should we worry about income inequality?我们应该担心收入不平等问题吗?
Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(2):271-94. doi: 10.2190/EHYF-NEPR-LP0Y-970K.
10
The upper part of the earnings distribution in the United States: how has it changed?美国收入分配的上层部分:它是如何变化的?
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(3):1-11.