Suppr超能文献

静态外固定器治疗肘慢性不稳定

The use of static external fixation for chronic instability of the elbow.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Aug;28(8):e255-e264. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic elbow instability after trauma is a challenging problem. Clinical results of external elbow fixation in this setting are limited, with most studies focusing on hinged external fixation. A static fixator is an alternative for maintaining joint reduction. Advantages of a static frame include ease of application, decreased need for special instrumentation, and more secure maintenance of a concentrically reduced joint in the setting of bone or soft tissue instability. The primary limitation of static fixation is the potential for stiffness.

METHODS

This retrospective review represents the largest reported cohort evaluating the use of static elbow external fixation for the treatment of chronic elbow instability. Twenty-seven cases treated by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2015 were identified.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were available for a clinical evaluation, including radiographs and a physical examination at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 1.4-12.4 years). Of note, 19 of 20 were clinically obese or overweight. At final evaluation, range of motion averaged from 20° ± 13° of extension to 134° ± 9° of flexion. All patients had stable elbows, except 1 patient who had valgus and varus laxity on stress examination. Radiographs of this patient showed an incongruous joint. Eight patients required an additional operation after external fixator removal, 3 for infection and 5 for stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

At almost 6 years of follow-up, static elbow external fixator resulted in a congruous joint with adequate functional and clinical outcomes in 95% of patients.

摘要

背景

创伤后慢性肘不稳定是一个具有挑战性的问题。在这种情况下,外部肘固定的临床结果是有限的,大多数研究都集中在铰链式外固定上。静态固定器是维持关节复位的另一种选择。静态框架的优点包括易于应用、减少对特殊器械的需求,以及在骨或软组织不稳定的情况下更安全地维持同心复位关节。静态固定的主要限制是潜在的僵硬。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,代表了迄今为止最大的一组评估使用静态肘部外固定治疗慢性肘不稳定的病例。该研究共纳入了 2004 年至 2015 年间由一位外科医生治疗的 27 例病例。

结果

20 例患者可进行临床评估,包括在平均 5.8 年(1.4-12.4 年)的随访时拍摄的 X 线片和体格检查。值得注意的是,20 例中有 19 例为临床肥胖或超重。最终评估时,活动度平均为 20°±13°的伸展至 134°±9°的屈曲。所有患者的肘部均稳定,除 1 例患者在应力检查时出现外翻和内翻松弛。该患者的 X 线片显示关节对位不良。8 例患者在去除外固定器后需要进行额外的手术,3 例为感染,5 例为僵硬。

结论

在近 6 年的随访中,静态肘部外固定器使 95%的患者关节对位良好,功能和临床结果满意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验