Deemer Alexa R, Solasz Sara, Ganta Abhishek, Egol Kenneth A, Konda Sanjit R
NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jan 5;48:102335. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102335. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Operative management is often required for fractures of the elbow, with treatment goals aiming to restore stability, reduction, and early range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for necessitating the application of an external fixator, and to compare range of motion and functional outcomes between patients who required an elbow external fixator to those who did not.
We hypothesize that patients who require an external fixator will have worse elbow range of motion and functional outcomes when compared to those who did not.
This is a retrospective study of 391 patients who presented at a Level-I trauma center between March 2011 and January 2021 for operative management of a fracture/fracture-dislocation of the distal humerus (AO/OTA 13A-C) and/or proximal ulna and/or radius (AO/OTA 21A-C). A primary analysis was performed to determine risk factors for necessitating the application of an external fixator. A secondary analysis was performed comparing elbow range-of-motion and functional outcomes between cases and controls.
391 patients were identified; 26 required external fixation (cases) and 365 did not (controls). Significant risk factors for necessitating placement of an external fixator included large BMI (OR = 1.087, 95 % CI = 1.007-1.173, p = 0.033), elbow dislocation (OR = 7.549, 95 % CI = 2.387-23.870, p = 0.001), open wound status (OR = 9.584, 95 % CI = 2.794-32.878, p < 0.001), and additional non-contiguous orthopaedic injury (OR = 9.225, 95 % CI = 2.219-38.360, p = 0.002). Elbow ROM was poorer in the external fixator group with regards to extension (-15°), flexion (+19.4°), and pronation (+14.3°) (p < 0.05). In addition, those who did not need external fixation had better functional scores (+20.4 points MEPI) (p < 0.05).
The use of external fixation about the elbow is associated with significantly worse initial injuries and results in poorer outcomes. These results can be used to inform the surgeon-patient discussion regarding treatment options and expected functional outcomes.
III.
肘部骨折通常需要手术治疗,治疗目标是恢复稳定性、实现复位并尽早恢复活动范围。本研究的目的是确定需要应用外固定架的危险因素,并比较需要肘部外固定架的患者与不需要的患者之间的活动范围和功能结果。
我们假设,与不需要外固定架的患者相比,需要外固定架的患者肘部活动范围和功能结果更差。
这是一项对391例患者的回顾性研究,这些患者于2011年3月至2021年1月在一级创伤中心接受肱骨远端(AO/OTA 13A-C)和/或尺骨近端和/或桡骨(AO/OTA 21A-C)骨折/骨折脱位的手术治疗。进行了一项初步分析以确定需要应用外固定架的危险因素。进行了一项二次分析,比较病例组和对照组之间的肘部活动范围和功能结果。
共确定391例患者;26例需要外固定(病例组),365例不需要(对照组)。需要放置外固定架的显著危险因素包括高体重指数(OR = 1.087,95% CI = 1.007 - 1.173,p = 0.033)、肘部脱位(OR = 7.549,95% CI = 2.387 - 23.870,p = 0.001)、开放性伤口情况(OR = 9.584,95% CI = 2.794 - 32.878,p < 0.001)以及额外的非连续性骨科损伤(OR = 9.225,95% CI = 2.219 - 38.360,p = 0.002)。外固定架组在伸展(-15°)、屈曲(+19.4°)和旋前(+14.3°)方面的肘部活动度较差(p < 0.05)。此外,不需要外固定的患者功能评分更高(MEPI增加20.4分)(p < 0.05)。
肘部使用外固定架与初始损伤明显更严重相关,且结果更差。这些结果可用于在外科医生与患者讨论治疗方案和预期功能结果时提供参考。
III级。