Discipline of Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jul;29(7):980-991. doi: 10.1111/sms.13415. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multimodal exercise program to increase trunk muscle morphology and strength in older individuals, and their associated changes in functional ability. Using a single-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial design, 64 older adults (≥60 years) were randomly allocated to a 12-week exercise program comprising walking and balance exercises with or without trunk strengthening/motor control exercises; followed by a 6-week walking-only program (detraining; 32 per group). Trunk muscle morphology (ultrasound imaging), strength (isokinetic dynamometer), and functional ability and balance (6-Minute Walk Test; 30 second Chair Stand Test; Sitting and Rising Test; Berg Balance Scale, Multi-Directional Reach Test; Timed Up and Go; Four Step Square Test) were the primary outcome measures. Sixty-four older adults (mean [SD]; age: 69.8 [7.5] years; 59.4% female) were randomized into two exercise groups. Trunk training relative to walking-balance training increased (mean difference [95% CI]) the size of the rectus abdominis (2.08 [1.29, 2.89] cm ), lumbar multifidus (L4/L5:0.39 [0.16, 0.61] cm; L5/S1:0.31 [0.07, 0.55] cm), and the lateral abdominal musculature (0.63 [0.40, 0.85] cm); and increased trunk flexion (29.8 [4.40, 55.31] N), extension (37.71 [15.17, 60.25] N), and lateral flexion (52.30 [36.57, 68.02] N) strength. Trunk training relative to walking-balance training improved 30-second Chair Stand Test (5.90 [3.39, 8.42] repetitions), Sitting and Rising Test (1.23 [0.24, 2.23] points), Forward Reach Test (4.20 [1.89, 6.51] cm), Backward Reach Test (2.42 [0.33, 4.52] cm), and Timed Up and Go Test (-0.76 [-1.40, -0.13] seconds). Detraining led to some declines but all outcomes remained significantly improved when compared to pre-training. These findings support the inclusion of trunk strengthening/motor control exercises as part of a multimodal exercise program for older adults.
本研究旨在评估多模式运动方案对增加老年人躯干肌肉形态和力量的有效性,以及对其功能能力的相关影响。采用单盲平行分组随机对照试验设计,将 64 名老年人(≥60 岁)随机分为 12 周的运动方案组,包括步行和平衡运动,或增加躯干强化/运动控制运动;随后进行 6 周的仅步行方案(脱训;每组 32 人)。主要观察指标为躯干肌肉形态(超声成像)、力量(等速测力计)以及功能能力和平衡(6 分钟步行测试;30 秒椅子站立测试;坐起测试;伯格平衡量表;多方向伸手测试;计时起立行走测试;四步方步测试)。64 名老年人(平均[标准差];年龄:69.8[7.5]岁;59.4%为女性)被随机分为两组运动方案。与步行-平衡运动相比,躯干训练增加了(平均差值[95%置信区间])腹直肌(2.08[1.29, 2.89]cm)、腰椎多裂肌(L4/L5:0.39[0.16, 0.61]cm;L5/S1:0.31[0.07, 0.55]cm)和侧腹肌(0.63[0.40, 0.85]cm)的大小;并增加了躯干屈曲(29.8[4.40, 55.31]N)、伸展(37.71[15.17, 60.25]N)和侧屈(52.30[36.57, 68.02]N)的力量。与步行-平衡运动相比,躯干训练改善了 30 秒椅子站立测试(5.90[3.39, 8.42]次重复)、坐起测试(1.23[0.24, 2.23]分)、前伸手测试(4.20[1.89, 6.51]cm)、后伸手测试(2.42[0.33, 4.52]cm)和计时起立行走测试(-0.76[-1.40, -0.13]秒)。脱训导致一些下降,但与训练前相比,所有结果仍显著改善。这些发现支持将躯干强化/运动控制运动纳入老年人多模式运动方案中。