Suppr超能文献

自我筋膜松解浅层腰背线可改善坐立前伸距离。

Self-Myofascial Release of the Superficial Back Line Improves Sit-and-Reach Distance.

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Oct 18;29(4):400-404. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0306. Print 2020 May 1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Decreased hamstring flexibility can lead to a plethora of musculoskeletal injuries, including low back pain, hamstring strains, and patellofemoral pain. Lack of flexibility may be the result of myofascial adhesions. The fascia connected to the hamstrings is part of the superficial back line that runs from the cranium to the plantar aspect of the foot. Any disruption along this chain may limit the flexibility of the hamstring.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if self-myofascial release (SMR) of the plantar surface of the foot in addition to the hamstring group was more effective at improving the flexibility of the hamstrings when compared with either intervention alone.

DESIGN

Cross-over study.

SETTING

Athletic training facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen college students (5 males and 10 females; age: 20.9 [1.4] y, height: 173.1 [10.3] cm, mass: 80.0 [24.9] kg) who were not older than 30, with no history of low back pain or injury within the past 6 months, no history of leg pain or injury within the past 6 months, no current signs or symptoms of cervical or lumbar radicular pain, no current complaint of numbness or tingling in the lower-extremity, and no history of surgery in the lower-extremity or legs.

INTERVENTIONS

Each participant received each intervention separated by at least 96 hours in a randomized order: hamstring foam rolling, lacrosse ball on the plantar surface of the foot, and a combination of both.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The sit-and-reach test evaluated hamstring flexibility of each participant before and immediately after each intervention.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences found among the SMR techniques on sit-and-reach distance (F2,41 = 2.7, P = .08, ηp2=.12). However, at least 20% of participants in each intervention improved sit-and-reach distance by 2.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

SMR may improve sit-and-reach distance, but one technique of SMR does not seem to be superior to another.

摘要

背景

腘绳肌柔韧性降低会导致大量的肌肉骨骼损伤,包括下腰痛、腘绳肌拉伤和髌股疼痛。缺乏柔韧性可能是筋膜粘连的结果。与跟腱相连的筋膜是从颅底延伸到足底的浅层后线的一部分。沿着这条链的任何中断都可能限制腘绳肌的柔韧性。

目的

研究自我筋膜松解(SMR)足底表面除了腘绳肌以外,是否比单独干预更有效地改善腘绳肌的柔韧性。

设计

交叉研究。

地点

运动训练设施。

参与者

15 名大学生(5 名男性和 10 名女性;年龄:20.9 [1.4]岁,身高:173.1 [10.3]厘米,体重:80.0 [24.9]公斤),年龄不超过 30 岁,无下腰痛或过去 6 个月内无损伤史,无过去 6 个月内腿部疼痛或损伤史,无颈椎或腰椎神经根痛的当前迹象或症状,无下肢麻木或刺痛的当前投诉,无下肢或腿部手术史。

干预措施

每位参与者均以随机顺序接受至少相隔 96 小时的三种干预措施:腘绳肌泡沫滚轴,足底的狼牙棒,以及两者的组合。

主要观察指标

每位参与者在每次干预前后均接受坐立前伸测试,以评估其腘绳肌柔韧性。

结果

在坐立前伸距离上,SMR 技术之间没有发现显著差异(F2,41 = 2.7,P =.08,ηp2=.12)。然而,每个干预措施中至少有 20%的参与者坐立前伸距离增加了 2.5 厘米。

结论

SMR 可能会改善坐立前伸距离,但一种 SMR 技术似乎并不比另一种技术优越。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验