Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,Iran.
Department of Medical physics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,Iran.
J Sport Rehabil. 2023 Mar 16;32(5):549-556. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0141. Print 2023 Jul 1.
Anatomy trains theory states that performing techniques in any part of the superficial myofascial backline can remotely treat other parts of this pathway. Due to the connections of different parts of the superficial backline, it is possible to influence the hamstring by performing the technique in the lumbar area. As chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP) may lead to or be caused by hamstring tightness, remote myofascial release (MFR) techniques using the superficial backline can help improve hamstring tightness.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of remote MFR on hamstring tightness for those with chronic nonspecific LBP.
Single-blind, parallel design.
The present study was performed at the clinical setting of Tarbiat Modares University in Iran.
This study included 40 participants (20 males and 20 females) who were 40.5 (5.3) years old with chronic nonspecific LBP and hamstring tightness.
Participants were randomly divided into the lumbar MFR (remote area) and hamstring MFR groups. Participants underwent 4 sessions of MFR for 2 weeks.
A passive knee-extension (PKE) test was used for muscle tightness evaluation 3 times.
Repeated-measure analysis of variance test showed that after the lumbar and hamstring MFR, the PKE was significantly reduced in both legs: lumbar MFR (right knee: from 61.04° [2.17°] to 51.01° [4.11°], P ≤ .003 and left knee: from 63.02° [3.12°] to 52.09° [2.48°], P ≤ .004) and hamstring MFR (right knee: from 62.01° [4.32°] to 50.50° [7.18°], P ≤ .001 and left knee: from 63.11° [2.56°] to 51.32° [5.31°], P ≤ .002). Least Significant Difference (LSD) post hoc test results showed that the 2 groups were not significantly different after the MFR (P ≥ .05). Also, the intraclass correlation coefficient index showed that the PKE test has excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, .910 for the right limb and .915 for the left limb). The minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence interval indicated that a change greater than or equal to 6° is required to exceed the threshold of the error PKE test, respectively.
The present study showed that the remote MFR technique to the lumbar region demonstrated the same significant results in decreasing hamstring tightness as was noted in hamstring MFR to both limbs in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.
解剖列车理论指出,在浅表层背部线的任何部位进行手法治疗,都可以远程治疗这条路径的其他部位。由于浅表层背部线各部位的连接,通过在腰部区域进行手法治疗,有可能影响到腿筋。由于慢性非特异性下腰痛(LBP)可能导致或由腿筋紧张引起,因此使用浅表层背部线的远程筋膜松解(MFR)技术可以帮助改善腿筋紧张。
本研究旨在评估对慢性非特异性 LBP 患者进行远程 MFR 对腿筋紧张的影响。
单盲、平行设计。
本研究在伊朗塔比阿特莫达雷斯大学的临床环境中进行。
本研究纳入了 40 名(20 名男性和 20 名女性)年龄为 40.5(5.3)岁的慢性非特异性 LBP 和腿筋紧张患者。
参与者被随机分为腰椎 MFR(远程区域)和腿筋 MFR 组。参与者接受了 4 次 MFR 治疗,为期 2 周。
使用被动膝关节伸展(PKE)试验 3 次评估肌肉紧张度。
重复测量方差分析检验显示,腰椎和腿筋 MFR 后,双腿的 PKE 均显著降低:腰椎 MFR(右侧膝关节:从 61.04°[2.17°]降至 51.01°[4.11°],P≤.003,左侧膝关节:从 63.02°[3.12°]降至 52.09°[2.48°],P≤.004)和腿筋 MFR(右侧膝关节:从 62.01°[4.32°]降至 50.50°[7.18°],P≤.001,左侧膝关节:从 63.11°[2.56°]降至 51.32°[5.31°],P≤.002)。最小显著差异(LSD)事后检验结果显示,MFR 后两组之间无显著差异(P≥.05)。此外,组内相关系数指数表明,PKE 试验具有极好的可靠性(右侧肢体的组内相关系数为.910,左侧肢体为.915)。95%置信区间的最小可检测变化表明,需要大于或等于 6°的变化才能超过 PKE 试验误差的阈值。
本研究表明,对慢性非特异性 LBP 患者的腰椎区域进行远程 MFR 技术,在降低腿筋紧张方面与对双侧腿筋进行 MFR 技术具有相同的显著效果。