Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Aug 15;36(16):2377-2384. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6354. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Various guidelines for minor head injury focus on patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 and loss of consciousness (LOC) or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), while clinical management for patients without LOC or PTA is often unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of presence and absence of LOC or PTA on intracranial complications in minor head injury. A prospective multi-center cohort study of all patients with blunt head injury and GCS score of 15 was conducted at six Dutch centers between 2015 and 2017. Five centers used the national guideline and one center used a local guideline-both based on the CT in Head Injury Patients (CHIP) prediction model-to identify patients in need of a computed tomography (CT) scan. We studied the presence of traumatic findings and neurosurgical interventions in patients with and without LOC or PTA. In addition, we assessed the association of LOC and PTA with traumatic findings with logistic regression analysis and the additional predictive value of LOC and PTA compared with other risk factors in the CHIP model. Of 3914 patients, 2249 (58%) experienced neither LOC nor PTA and in 305 (8%) LOC and PTA was unknown. Traumatic findings were present in 153 of 1360 patients (11%) with LOC or PTA and in 67 of 2249 patients (3%) without LOC and PTA. Five patients without LOC and PTA had potential neurosurgical lesions and one patient underwent a neurosurgical intervention. LOC and PTA were strongly associated with traumatic findings on CT, with adjusted odds ratios of 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.8) and 3.5 (95% CI 2.7-4.6), respectively. To conclude, patients who had minor head injury with neither LOC nor PTA are at risk of intracranial complications. Clinical guidelines should include clinical management for patients without LOC and PTA, and they should include LOC and PTA as separate risk factors rather than as diagnostic selection criteria.
各种针对轻微头部损伤的指南都侧重于格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 13-15 分且有意识丧失(LOC)或创伤后遗忘症(PTA)的患者,而对于无 LOC 或 PTA 的患者的临床管理通常不明确。我们旨在研究 LOC 或 PTA 的有无对轻微头部损伤患者颅内并发症的影响。这是一项在 2015 年至 2017 年期间在荷兰的六个中心进行的针对所有 GCS 评分为 15 的钝性头部损伤患者的前瞻性多中心队列研究。五个中心使用国家指南,一个中心使用基于 CT 头部损伤患者(CHIP)预测模型的当地指南来识别需要进行 CT 扫描的患者。我们研究了有和无 LOC 或 PTA 的患者中创伤发现和神经外科干预的存在情况。此外,我们使用逻辑回归分析评估了 LOC 和 PTA 与创伤发现的相关性,并评估了 LOC 和 PTA 与 CHIP 模型中的其他危险因素相比的额外预测价值。在 3914 名患者中,2249 名(58%)既无 LOC 也无 PTA,305 名(8%)LOC 和 PTA 未知。在有 LOC 或 PTA 的 1360 名患者中有 153 名(11%)和在无 LOC 且 PTA 的 2249 名患者中有 67 名(3%)存在创伤发现。5 名无 LOC 且 PTA 的患者有潜在的神经外科病变,1 名患者接受了神经外科干预。LOC 和 PTA 与 CT 上的创伤发现密切相关,调整后的比值比分别为 2.9(95%置信区间[CI]2.2-3.8)和 3.5(95%CI2.7-4.6)。总之,无 LOC 且 PTA 的轻微头部损伤患者有颅内并发症的风险。临床指南应包括无 LOC 和 PTA 的患者的临床管理,并且应将 LOC 和 PTA 作为单独的危险因素纳入,而不是作为诊断选择标准。