• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陡坡伐木作业的安全性。

Safety in steep slope logging operations.

机构信息

a College of Forestry , Oregon State University , Corvallis , OR , USA.

b Garland & Associates , Waldport , OR , USA.

出版信息

J Agromedicine. 2019 Apr;24(2):138-145. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1581115. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2019.1581115
PMID:30860962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926939/
Abstract

Partial results of a NIOSH-funded study for "Protecting the Logging Workforce: Development of Innovative Logging Techniques for a Safer Work Environment" by a team of researchers at Oregon State University are presented that review safety in steep slope logging. Comparisons are made for hazards and exposures of "conventional" and new technologies for steep slopes. Hazards of new technologies are identified. Safety assessments are addressed for forestry sectors internationally, for the firm and for workers. Important questions of technical feasibility, economic viability and environmental performance are raised. Ongoing research on operators using tethered and untethered systems are described. Results will help inform training and selecting operators. New Best Operating Practices and safety code regulations will result from the research. New technologies will reduce worker hazards and exposures for steep slope logging.

摘要

由俄勒冈州立大学的研究团队开展的 NIOSH 资助研究“保护伐木工人:为更安全的工作环境开发创新的伐木技术”的部分成果,介绍了陡坡伐木的安全性。对“传统”和新技术在陡坡作业的危害和暴露进行了比较。确定了新技术的危害。针对国际林业部门、公司和工人进行了安全评估。提出了技术可行性、经济可行性和环境性能的重要问题。正在对使用系绳和无系绳系统的操作人员进行研究。研究结果将有助于为培训和选择操作人员提供信息。新的最佳作业实践和安全法规将从研究中产生。新技术将减少陡坡伐木工人的危险和暴露。

相似文献

1
Safety in steep slope logging operations.陡坡伐木作业的安全性。
J Agromedicine. 2019 Apr;24(2):138-145. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1581115. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
2
Retrospective Risk Assessment of Injuries and Fatalities in the Forestry and Logging Workforce in the United States, 2003-2019.2003-2019 年美国林业和伐木业劳动力伤害和死亡的回顾性风险评估。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Jul;29(3):372-383. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2325708. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Job Factors Associated with Occupational Injuries and Deaths in the United States Forestry Industry.美国林业行业与职业伤害和死亡相关的工作因素。
Chem Eng Trans. 2017 Jun;58:115-120. doi: 10.3303/CET1758020.
4
Documentation of hazards and safety perceptions for mechanized logging operations in East Central Alabama.阿拉巴马州中东部机械化伐木作业的危险与安全认知记录。
J Agric Saf Health. 2001 May;7(2):113-23. doi: 10.13031/2013.2673.
5
A comparison of owner/operator and worker perspectives on workplace safety in the West Virginia logging industry.西弗吉尼亚伐木业中业主/经营者和工人对工作场所安全的看法比较。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Apr;64(4):301-309. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23228. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Health and safety in the Maine woods: Assemblage and baseline characteristics of a longitudinal cohort of logging workers.缅因州森林中的健康与安全:伐木工人纵向队列的组合与基线特征。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Oct;63(10):907-916. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23165. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
7
A mixed-methods analysis of logging injuries in Montana and Idaho.蒙大拿州和爱达荷州伐木伤的混合方法分析。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Dec;60(12):1077-1087. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22759. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
8
A qualitative assessment of safe work practices in logging in the southern United States.美国南部伐木业安全工作实践的定性评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jan;60(1):58-68. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22656. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
9
Learning to take action: the goals of health and safety training.学会采取行动:健康与安全培训的目标。
New Solut. 2012;22(3):255-67. doi: 10.2190/NS.22.3.b.
10
The human factors of implementing shift work in logging operations.伐木作业中实施轮班工作的人为因素。
J Agric Saf Health. 2008 Oct;14(4):391-404. doi: 10.13031/2013.25278.

引用本文的文献

1
Forestry - Integrating Safety in a Time of Rapid Change.林业——在快速变革时期融入安全
J Agromedicine. 2021 Jan;26(1):88-91. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2021.1849294. Epub 2021 Apr 11.