School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.171. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US-guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology.
We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model.
Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non-US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.41-37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.49-5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications.
US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.
经股动脉入路被神经介入医生广泛用于接受诊断和治疗性血管内操作的患者,以进入股动脉。对于解剖结构更具挑战性的患者,双功能超声(US)可能是股血管入路的有价值的辅助手段。我们旨在评估在介入神经放射学中使用双功能 US 引导股动脉入路的有效性证据。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 EMBASE,并纳入了 5 项随机对照试验。使用随机效应模型对 OR 和均数差值进行汇总。
对包括 784 例 US 引导患者和 769 例非 US 引导患者的 5 项 RCT 的荟萃分析发现,在进入股动脉的时间(加权均数差值:24.90 分钟,95%置信区间 [CI] 12.41-37.38)、初次通过成功率(OR 2.97;95% CI 1.49-5.92)和总并发症发生率(OR 0.42,95% CI 0.23-0.77)方面,US 引导方法具有显著优势。在技术成功率、尝试次数或单个并发症方面无统计学差异。
US 引导股动脉入路用于血管内操作是一种安全有效的方法,可在血管内操作期间可视化股动脉。神经介入医生应考虑将其作为一种辅助手段,特别是对于解剖结构具有挑战性或有高出血并发症风险的患者。