• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌骨畸形的功能稳定性分析。

Functional stability analyses of maxillofacial skeleton bearing cleft deformities.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 14 Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Chengdu, 610041, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 12;9(1):4261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40478-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-40478-w
PMID:30862870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6414651/
Abstract

The symmetrically stable craniofacial bony structure supports the complex functions and delicate contour of the face. Congenital craniofacial deformities are often accompanied by bony defects and have been repetitively correlated with compromised dento-maxillary stability, but neither the extent nor the pattern of cleft-related maxillary instability has been explored in detail. Furthermore, it is largely unknown if the bony defect and related instability are correlated with secondary maxillary deformity common among patients with orofacial clefts. With the aid of finite element modeling, we studied the detailed relationship between cleft-related bony defect and maxillary stability under occlusal loading. Craniofacial models were generated based on cone-beam computed tomography data and loaded with mimicked bite forces along the axial axis of each tooth. Our data showed that all cleft models exhibited more asymmetrical deformations under mastication compared with the normal. Models with palatal cleft demonstrated greater asymmetry, greater dental arch contraction, and less maxillary protrusion compared to models with alveolar cleft only. For unilateral cleft models, alveolus on non-cleft side tended to be more protruded and lifted than the cleft side. For bilateral cleft models, the most prominent feature was the seriously contracted alveolar arch and curved and pitched premaxillae. These findings indicated cleft type-specific pattern of maxillary instability, which were largely in accordance with dentoalveolar morphological features among patients. Collectively, our study elucidated the detailed relationship between cleft bony defect and the pattern of maxillary instability, and suggested a prototype for studying the abnormal maxillary and dental arch growth among patients with craniofacial deformities.

摘要

对称稳定的颅面骨结构支撑着面部复杂的功能和精细的轮廓。先天性颅面畸形常伴有骨缺陷,并与牙颌面稳定性受损密切相关,但尚未详细探讨过裂隙相关上颌骨不稳定的程度和模式。此外,在很大程度上尚不清楚骨缺陷和相关不稳定是否与口腔裂隙患者中常见的继发性上颌骨畸形有关。借助有限元建模,我们研究了在咬合加载下裂隙相关骨缺陷与上颌稳定性之间的详细关系。基于锥形束 CT 数据生成颅面模型,并沿每个牙齿的轴向轴模拟加载咀嚼力。我们的数据表明,与正常模型相比,所有裂隙模型在咀嚼时表现出更大的不对称变形。与仅牙槽裂模型相比,腭裂模型的不对称性更大,牙弓收缩更大,上颌前突更小。对于单侧裂隙模型,非裂隙侧的牙槽倾向于比裂隙侧更突出和抬起。对于双侧裂隙模型,最突出的特征是牙槽弓严重收缩,以及前颌骨弯曲和倾斜。这些发现表明了上颌骨不稳定的裂隙类型特异性模式,这在很大程度上与患者的牙牙槽形态特征一致。总之,我们的研究阐明了裂隙骨缺陷与上颌骨不稳定模式之间的详细关系,并为研究颅面畸形患者上颌骨和牙弓异常生长提供了一个原型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/bd3355cc712a/41598_2019_40478_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/0ca3d4f4180c/41598_2019_40478_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/885fbf964b49/41598_2019_40478_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/a5fb09e67796/41598_2019_40478_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/65046e5defe6/41598_2019_40478_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/bd3355cc712a/41598_2019_40478_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/0ca3d4f4180c/41598_2019_40478_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/885fbf964b49/41598_2019_40478_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/a5fb09e67796/41598_2019_40478_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/65046e5defe6/41598_2019_40478_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f61/6414651/bd3355cc712a/41598_2019_40478_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional stability analyses of maxillofacial skeleton bearing cleft deformities.上颌骨畸形的功能稳定性分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 12;9(1):4261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40478-w.
2
Biomechanical effects on maxillary protraction of the craniofacial skeleton with cleft lip and palate after alveolar bone graft.牙槽骨移植后唇腭裂对颅面骨骼上颌前牵引的生物力学影响。
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Mar;24(2):446-53. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826cfe27.
3
Stress and displacement pattern evaluation using two different palatal expanders in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.使用两种不同的腭扩展器对单侧唇腭裂进行应力和位移模式评估:三维有限元分析
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0150-0. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Dynamic analysis of the effects of upper lip pressure on the asymmetry of the facial skeleton in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.单侧完全性唇腭裂患者上唇压力对面部骨骼不对称影响的动态分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Mar;46(2):154-60. doi: 10.1597/07-177.1. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
5
The dynamics in implantation for patients with clefts.腭裂患者的植入动态。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Jan;43(1):84-91. doi: 10.1597/04-091r1.1.
6
Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.腭裂类型、面罩锚固方法及牙槽骨移植对上颌前牵引的影响:三维有限元分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Mar;49(2):221-9. doi: 10.1597/10-265. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
7
Biomechanical effects of rapid palatal expansion on the craniofacial skeleton with cleft palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.快速腭扩展对腭裂颅面骨骼的生物力学影响:三维有限元分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Mar;44(2):149-54. doi: 10.1597/05-161.1.
8
Compensations in Bone Morphology and the Dentition in Patients With Untreated Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis.未经治疗的单侧唇腭裂患者的骨形态和牙列代偿:锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Nov;55(10):1358-1366. doi: 10.1177/1055665618757635. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.单侧腭裂和牙槽突裂患者上颌前牵引联合或不联合快速上颌扩弓三维有限元模型的位移预测
Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Aug 19;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0074-9.
10
Severity of alveolar cleft before palatoplasty affects vertical maxillofacial growth in 6-year-old patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.腭裂修补术前牙槽裂严重程度影响单侧完全性唇腭裂 6 岁患者的颌面部垂直向生长。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Apr;141(4 Suppl):S102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on orthodontic treatment of protrusive facial deformities.突面畸形正畸治疗专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Feb 1;17(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00338-4.
2
Finite element analysis of maxillary orthodontic therapies with variable alveolar bone grafts under occlusal forces in patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂患者在咬合力作用下采用不同牙槽骨移植的上颌正畸治疗的有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Nov 5;12:1448286. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1448286. eCollection 2024.
3
Craniosynostosis: orofacial and oral health perspectives with masticatory insights.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of the Development of the Maxillae and Vomer in Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.双侧唇腭裂患者上颌骨和犁骨的发育特征
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Sep;29(6):1526-1530. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004469.
2
Structural biomechanics of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton under maximal masticatory loading: Inferences and critical analysis based on a validated computational model.最大咀嚼负荷下颅颌面骨骼的结构生物力学:基于验证后的计算模型的推断与批判性分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jun;70(6):842-850. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Xenogeneic Bio-Root Prompts the Constructive Process Characterized by Macrophage Phenotype Polarization in Rodents and Nonhuman Primates.
颅缝早闭:咀嚼相关的口面及口腔健康视角
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04540-y.
4
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of alveolar cleft bone graft on the maxillofacial biomechanical stabilities of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.牙槽裂植骨对单侧完全性唇腭裂患者上颌骨生物力学稳定性影响的三维有限元分析。
Biomed Eng Online. 2022 May 20;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12938-022-01000-y.
异种生物牙根促进了以巨噬细胞表型极化为特征的构建过程,在啮齿动物和非人灵长类动物中。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Mar;6(5). doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601112. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unilateral mastication in malocclusion cases using cone-beam computed tomography and a motion capture system.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描和运动捕捉系统对错牙合病例单侧咀嚼的三维有限元分析
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Apr;46(2):96-106. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.2.96. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Bite force of children with repaired unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧和双侧唇腭裂修复术后儿童的咬合力。
Arch Oral Biol. 2016 Aug;68:83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Difference in the Surgical Outcome of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with and without Pre-Alveolar Bone Graft Orthodontic Treatment.接受和未接受牙槽骨植骨正畸治疗的单侧唇腭裂患者手术结果的差异。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 4;6:23597. doi: 10.1038/srep23597.
7
Quantifying Optimal Columellar Strut Dimensions for Nasal Tip Stabilization After Rhinoplasty via Finite Element Analysis.通过有限元分析量化鼻整形术后鼻尖稳定的最佳鼻中隔支撑柱尺寸。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 May 1;18(3):194-200. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2261.
8
Mechanoresponsive Properties of the Periodontal Ligament.牙周韧带的力学响应特性
J Dent Res. 2016 Apr;95(4):467-75. doi: 10.1177/0022034515626102. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
9
Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.单侧腭裂和牙槽突裂患者上颌前牵引联合或不联合快速上颌扩弓三维有限元模型的位移预测
Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Aug 19;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0074-9.
10
CAD based design sensitivity analysis and shape optimization of scaffolds for bio-root regeneration in swine.基于 CAD 的生物牙根再生支架设计敏感性分析与形状优化。
Biomaterials. 2015 Jul;57:59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.062. Epub 2015 Apr 24.