Suppr超能文献

电烧伤:印度情况下高压与低压损伤结局的比较

Electrical burn injury: a comparison of outcomes of high voltage versus low voltage injury in an Indian scenario.

作者信息

Srivastava S, Kumari H, Singh A, Rai R K

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Rajasthan, India.

University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, India.

出版信息

Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2018 Sep 30;31(3):174-177.

Abstract

Electrical burn injury (EBI) is a mutilating form of injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate the various aspects of EBI and analyse the differences between high voltage injury (HVI) and low voltage injury (LVI). A retrospective study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of all burn admissions from June 2016 to May 2017. A total of 1572 patients were admitted, of which 385 (24.49%) had suffered an electrical injury. 104 (27.01%) patients sustained LVI and 281 (72.98%) HVI. One hundred patients from both groups were randomly selected using the chit method, in order to analyse their differences. In our study, the mean age was 35.23±19.96 in the HVI group and 24.15±14.39 years in the LVI group. Most of the injuries were work related. Events during the early phase of admission included a rise in serum creatine phosphokinases, myoglobinuria, renal failure, abnormal cardiac events and other concomitant injuries in the HVI group (p<0.001). Unfavourable outcomes in the form of amputations, prolonged hospital stay and high mortality rate were observed in the HVI group (8.5%) (p<0.027). However, LVI cannot be overlooked as number of reconstructive surgeries and mean number of operations showed no significant difference between both groups. HVI has a disastrous impact on burn survivors but LVI cannot be underestimated. We advocate a low threshold for managing associated injuries, education on safety principles, for men at work especially, and infrastructure improvement by the state to bring changes to the present scenario.

摘要

电烧伤(EBI)是一种致残性损伤形式。本研究的目的是评估电烧伤的各个方面,并分析高压损伤(HVI)和低压损伤(LVI)之间的差异。通过回顾2016年6月至2017年5月所有烧伤入院患者的病历进行了一项回顾性研究。共收治1572例患者,其中385例(24.49%)遭受电损伤。104例(27.01%)患者为低压损伤,281例(72.98%)为高压损伤。采用抽签法从两组中各随机选取100例患者,以分析他们之间的差异。在我们的研究中,高压损伤组的平均年龄为35.23±19.96岁,低压损伤组为24.15±14.39岁。大多数损伤与工作有关。入院早期的事件包括高压损伤组血清肌酸磷酸激酶升高、肌红蛋白尿、肾衰竭、心脏异常事件及其他合并损伤(p<0.001)。高压损伤组出现了截肢、住院时间延长和高死亡率等不良后果(8.5%)(p<0.027)。然而,低压损伤也不能被忽视,因为两组的重建手术数量和平均手术次数没有显著差异。高压损伤对烧伤幸存者有灾难性影响,但低压损伤也不能被低估。我们主张对合并损伤的处理保持低阈值,开展安全原则教育,特别是对在职男性的教育,并由国家改善基础设施,以改变目前的状况。

相似文献

7
Pediatric electrical injuries: a review of 38 consecutive patients.小儿电击伤:38例连续病例回顾
J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Aug;39(8):1233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.04.004.

本文引用的文献

6
Socioeconomic deprivation and burns.
Burns. 2010 May;36(3):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
7
Electrical burns: a retrospective analysis across a 5-year period.电烧伤:5 年回顾性分析。
Burns. 2009 Nov;35(7):1015-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.01.014. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
9
Narrative review: Electrocution and life-threatening electrical injuries.叙述性综述:触电与危及生命的电损伤
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):531-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00011.
10
One hundred ninety-five cases of high-voltage electric injury.195例高压电损伤病例。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(4):331-40. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000169893.25351.a9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验