Brandão C, Vaz M, Brito I M, Ferreira B, Meireles R, Ramos S, Cabral L
Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2017 Dec 31;30(4):268-271.
Although electrical burns have a rather low incidence, they are considered one of the most devastating injuries. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse specific aspects of electrical injuries and to delineate a prevention strategy. A retrospective analysis of medical records of all the patients admitted to our Unit with electrical burns over a 10-year period (2006/01/01-2015/12/31) was undertaken. Demographic data, mechanism of injury and electric current voltage, total burn surface area (TBSA), location and depth of burns, acute complications, surgical interventions and length of hospital stay (LOS) were analysed. Out of 1695 burn patients admitted to our Unit, 99 subjects (5.84%) suffered electrical burns. 97% of these patients were male. The mean age was 38.3±13.7years and mean TBSA was 11.9%±13.2%. The mechanism of injury was occupational in 75 cases. Injuries were classified as low-voltage burns (24.2%), highvoltage burns (30.3%) and flash burns (45.5%). TBSA (p=0.014), mean LOS (p=0.002) and serum creatinine kinase levels (p<0.001) were significantly higher in patients with high-voltage injury in comparison to low-voltage injury, as well as the incidence of escharotomy/ fasciotomy (p=0.049) and flap surgeries (p=0.004). Although there was a higher incidence of amputations in this group (16.7% vs. 12.5%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.487). The high prevalence of electrical burns in males and workers emphasizes the need to review occupational safety regulations. Educational efforts regarding potential hazards of electricity and reinforcing compliance with safety measures are essential to avoid these injuri.
尽管电烧伤的发生率相对较低,但它们被认为是最具毁灭性的损伤之一。这项回顾性研究的目的是分析电损伤的具体方面,并制定预防策略。我们对本单位在10年期间(2006/01/01 - 2015/12/31)收治的所有电烧伤患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。分析了人口统计学数据、损伤机制和电流电压、烧伤总面积(TBSA)、烧伤部位和深度、急性并发症、手术干预以及住院时间(LOS)。在本单位收治的1695例烧伤患者中,99例(5.84%)为电烧伤。这些患者中97%为男性。平均年龄为38.3±13.7岁,平均烧伤总面积为11.9%±13.2%。损伤机制为职业性的有75例。损伤分为低压烧伤(24.2%)、高压烧伤(30.3%)和闪电烧伤(45.5%)。与低压损伤患者相比,高压损伤患者的烧伤总面积(p = 0.014)、平均住院时间(p = 0.002)和血清肌酸激酶水平(p < 0.001)显著更高,以及焦痂切开术/筋膜切开术(p = 0.049)和皮瓣手术(p = 0.004)的发生率也更高。尽管该组截肢发生率较高(16.7%对12.5%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.487)。电烧伤在男性和工人中的高发生率强调了审查职业安全法规的必要性。关于电的潜在危害的教育努力以及加强对安全措施的遵守对于避免这些损伤至关重要。