Hwang Chang Ju, Lee Jae Hyup, Kim Jung-Hoon, Min Sang Hyuk, Park Kun-Woo, Seo Hyoung-Yeon, Song Kwang-Sup
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 4;2019:4905013. doi: 10.1155/2019/4905013. eCollection 2019.
A number of studies have been published proposing various approaches to the treatment of neuropathic pain; however, to our knowledge, no attempts have been made to compare gabapentin and fentanyl in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. We evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of fentanyl matrix and gabapentin for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain of radicular origin. The study was designed as a randomized blind multicentered parallel-group noninferiority trial. A total of 108 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (≥4 intensity on an 11-point numeric rating scale) were randomly prescribed either fentanyl matrix or gabapentin over a period of 56 days. In the primary analysis, the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix treatment was evaluated in relation to the efficacy of gabapentin based on the pain intensity difference (PID) at 56 days after the first dose of the drugs. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, improvement in functional status (the Korean-Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI)), improvement in depressive symptoms (Korean-Beck Depression Index (K-BDI)) between the 28th and 56th day, and adverse events (AEs). Analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint established the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix compared with gabapentin, with no statistically significant difference observed in the PID after 56 days for the two treatment groups. Similarly, analysis of pain relief revealed no significant differences between the groups on days 28 and 56. There was no difference in the K-ODI and K-BDI between the groups during the study period. The overall incidence of at least one AE was similar for fentanyl matrix (67.3%) and gabapentin (69.6%). The most commonly reported AEs for patients treated with fentanyl matrix and gabapentin included dizziness (30.8% vs. 44.6%, respectively), somnolence (26.9% vs. 35.7%), and constipation (15.4% vs. 17.9%). This study demonstrated that the analgesic effect of fentanyl matrix is noninferior in comparison with gabapentin and supports the use of fentanyl matrix as an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic neuropathic pain. This trial is registered with NCT01127100.
已有多项研究发表,提出了治疗神经性疼痛的各种方法;然而,据我们所知,尚未有人尝试比较加巴喷丁和芬太尼对腰椎神经根病患者的疗效。我们评估了芬太尼透皮贴剂和加巴喷丁治疗神经根性慢性神经性疼痛的相对疗效和安全性。该研究设计为一项随机、盲法、多中心、平行组非劣效性试验。共有108例中重度疼痛患者(11点数字评分量表上疼痛强度≥4)在56天内被随机分配接受芬太尼透皮贴剂或加巴喷丁治疗。在初步分析中,根据首次给药后56天的疼痛强度差异(PID),评估芬太尼透皮贴剂治疗相对于加巴喷丁疗效的非劣效性。次要终点包括疼痛缓解、功能状态改善(韩国-奥斯威斯利残疾指数(K-ODI))、第28天至56天抑郁症状改善(韩国-贝克抑郁指数(K-BDI))以及不良事件(AE)。对主要疗效终点的分析确定了芬太尼透皮贴剂相对于加巴喷丁的非劣效性,两个治疗组在56天后的PID方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。同样,对疼痛缓解的分析显示,在第28天和56天两组之间没有显著差异。在研究期间,两组之间的K-ODI和K-BDI没有差异。芬太尼透皮贴剂(67.3%)和加巴喷丁(69.6%)至少发生一次AE的总体发生率相似。接受芬太尼透皮贴剂和加巴喷丁治疗的患者最常报告的AE包括头晕(分别为30.8%和44.6%)、嗜睡(26.9%和