• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性下腰痛患者药物治疗成功的预测因素:系统评价。

Predictors of success of pharmacological management in patients with chronic lower back pain: systematic review.

机构信息

GSpine4, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University La Sapienza, 00185, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 18;19(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04741-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04741-9
PMID:38637804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11025267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conservative management is recommended as the first therapeutic step in chronic low back pain (LBP), but there is no available evidence regarding the possible effect of patients' baseline characteristics on the therapeutic outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate this point.

METHODS

In February 2024, all the level I studies investigating the role of pharmacological management for chronic LBP were accessed. Data concerning the patient demographic at baseline were collected: number of patients and related mean BMI and age, duration of the symptoms, duration of the follow-up, percentage of females, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The outcomes at the last follow-up were evaluated through NRS, RMQ, and ODI. A multiple linear model regression diagnostic through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used.

RESULTS

Data from 47 articles (9007 patients) were obtained. The analysis yielded the following significant associations: age at baseline and NRS at follow-up (r = - 0.22; P = 0.04), NRS at baseline with NRS (r = 0.26; P = 0.03) and RMQ (r = - 0.58; P = 0.02) at follow-up, RMQ at baseline and the same at follow-up (r = 0.69; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Older age, higher BMI, presence of comorbidities, higher ODI and a long history of symptoms or surgical treatments do not reduce the efficacy of pharmacological management of chronic LBP. However, pharmacological therapy is not an effective option for patients with high baseline RMQ.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I systematic review of RCTs.

摘要

背景

慢性下背痛(LBP)的首选治疗方法是保守治疗,但目前尚无关于患者基线特征对治疗结果可能产生影响的证据。为此,我们进行了一项系统性文献回顾。

方法

2024 年 2 月,我们检索了所有关于药物治疗慢性 LBP 的 I 级研究。收集基线时患者的人口统计学数据:患者数量和相关的平均 BMI 与年龄、症状持续时间、随访时间、女性比例、数字评分量表(NRS)、Roland Morris 残疾问卷(RMQ)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)。通过 NRS、RMQ 和 ODI 评估末次随访时的结果。采用 Pearson 积矩相关系数(r)进行多元线性模型回归诊断。

结果

共获得 47 篇文章(9007 例患者)的数据。分析发现以下显著关联:基线年龄与随访时 NRS(r=-0.22;P=0.04)、基线 NRS 与随访时 NRS(r=0.26;P=0.03)和 RMQ(r=-0.58;P=0.02)、基线 RMQ 与随访时 RMQ(r=0.69;P=0.0001)。

结论

年龄较大、BMI 较高、合并症、ODI 较高以及症状或手术治疗史较长并不降低慢性 LBP 药物治疗的疗效。然而,药物治疗对于基线 RMQ 较高的患者不是有效的选择。

证据等级

RCT 的系统评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2e/11025267/d113afd443a4/13018_2024_4741_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2e/11025267/88036651a058/13018_2024_4741_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2e/11025267/d113afd443a4/13018_2024_4741_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2e/11025267/88036651a058/13018_2024_4741_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2e/11025267/d113afd443a4/13018_2024_4741_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of success of pharmacological management in patients with chronic lower back pain: systematic review.慢性下腰痛患者药物治疗成功的预测因素:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 18;19(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04741-9.
2
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.下腰痛患者疼痛和残疾评定工具的反应度及最小临床重要差异
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Oct 25;7:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-82.
3
Validation of the Roland Morris Questionnaire in Colombia to Evaluate Disability in Low Back Pain.罗兰·莫里斯问卷在哥伦比亚用于评估腰痛所致残疾的效度验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):1108-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000963.
4
Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain.常见下腰痛患者疼痛、功能障碍与生活质量之间的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 15;29(2):206-10. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107235.47465.08.
5
Physiotherapeutic and non-conventional approaches in patients with chronic low-back pain: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis.慢性下背痛患者的物理治疗和非传统方法:I 级贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62276-9.
6
Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛患者疼痛强度和功能障碍的最小临床重要变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2915-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae.
7
Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.哥伦比亚低腰痛患者 Oswestry 残疾问卷的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.
8
Validation of the Hungarian version of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷匈牙利语版本的验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):86-90. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.909536. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
9
A Comparison of Back Pain Functional Scale With Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36-Health Survey.腰痛功能量表与 Roland Morris 残疾问卷、Oswestry 残疾指数和 36 健康调查简表的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jun 15;43(12):877-882. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002431.
10
Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.意大利亚急性和慢性下腰痛患者的 Oswestry 功能障碍指数和 Roland Morris 残疾问卷的反应性。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):122-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1959-3. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of spinal injury in professional golfers in South Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional study.韩国职业高尔夫球手脊柱损伤的特征:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e095700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095700.
2
Management of sacroiliac joint pain: current concepts.骶髂关节疼痛的管理:当前概念
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 21;35(1):208. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04308-2.
3
Management of coccygodynia: talking points from a systematic review of recent clinical trials.尾骨痛的管理:近期临床试验系统评价的要点

本文引用的文献

1
Female Gender Is Associated with a Higher Prevalence of Chronic Neck Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain, and Migraine: Results of the Spanish National Health Survey, 2017.女性性别与慢性颈部疼痛、慢性下腰痛和偏头痛的患病率较高相关:2017 年西班牙国家健康调查结果。
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 23;22(2):382-395. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa368.
2
A Comprehensive Review of Over the Counter Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛非处方治疗的综合综述
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00209-w. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
3
The Technique of Intradiscal Injection: A Narrative Review.
Ann Jt. 2025 Jan 21;10:9. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-40. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.教育对下背痛患者接受物理治疗的影响:一项I级系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Feb 19;51(1):113. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9.
椎间盘内注射技术:一项叙述性综述
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Oct 9;16:953-968. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S251495. eCollection 2020.
4
The pharmacological management of chronic lower back pain.慢性下背痛的药理学管理。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Jan;22(1):109-119. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1817384. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Exercise treatment effect modifiers in persistent low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis of 3514 participants from 27 randomised controlled trials.对持续性腰痛的运动治疗效果调节剂进行分析:来自 27 项随机对照试验的 3514 名参与者的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;54(21):1277-1278. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101205. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
6
Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis.哪种特定的运动训练模式对治疗腰痛最有效?网络荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;54(21):1279-1287. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100886. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Efficacy of antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes (the AIM study): double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre trial.抗生素治疗慢性下腰痛伴 Modic 改变患者的疗效(AIM 研究):双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、多中心试验。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5654.
8
Gabapentin versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix for the Alleviation of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Radicular Origin: A Randomized Blind Multicentered Parallel-Group Noninferiority Trial.加巴喷丁与透皮芬太尼基质治疗神经根性慢性神经病理性疼痛的疗效比较:一项随机双盲多中心平行组非劣效性试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 4;2019:4905013. doi: 10.1155/2019/4905013. eCollection 2019.
9
Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data.基于常规数据的腰痛真实世界发生率和患病率。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Low back pain and some associated factors: is there any difference between genders?腰痛及相关因素:性别之间有差异吗?
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 13.