Park Younghee, Kim Kyubo, Park Hae Jin, Jeong Seung-Yong, Park Kyu Joo, Han Sae-Won, Kim Tae-You, Chie Eui Kyu
1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine , Republic of Korea.
Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20180794. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180794. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
To evaluate outcomes and toxicity profiles after re-irradiation in patients with pelvic recurrence of anorectal cancer.
25 anorectal cancer patients who received re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence between 2005 and 2015 were included. For initial treatment, all patients underwent surgical resection and preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy.
The median follow-up duration was 21.5 months (range, 2.9-84.4). After a median of 43.3 months (range, 11.7-218.5), patients received re-irradiation with a median dose of 45 Gy (range, 36-60). The equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of re-irradiation-calculated using α/β = 10 Gy-ranged from 34.5 to 84.0 Gy (median, 46.4). Surgical resection was performed for 11 patients, and 14 patients received concurrent chemotherapy with re-irradiation. The 3-year local progression-free survival was 29.7%. The 3-year overall survival was 49.7%. Concurrent chemotherapy with re-irradiation and re-irradiation doses >50 Gy EQD2 were significant prognostic factors for local progression free survival and overall survival according to multivariate analysis. 90% (9 of 10) of patients with symptoms had improvement after re-irradiation. Among 23 patients available for evaluation of late toxicity, 12 developed late toxicities. There were no Grade 4 late toxicities, and 6 patients had Grade 3 late toxicities (small bowel obstruction, bowel perforation and fistula).
Re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence of anorectal cancer improved symptoms of patients but the rate of late toxicity was high. Further investigation for patient selection is required.
Re-irradiation could be considered as a possible option for pelvic recurrence of anorectal cancer in selected patients.
评估肛管直肠癌盆腔复发患者再次放疗后的疗效和毒性反应情况。
纳入2005年至2015年间因盆腔复发接受再次放疗的25例肛管直肠癌患者。所有患者初始治疗均接受了手术切除及术前或术后放疗。
中位随访时间为21.5个月(范围2.9 - 84.4个月)。中位43.3个月(范围11.7 - 218.5个月)后,患者接受再次放疗,中位剂量为45 Gy(范围36 - 60 Gy)。使用α/β = 10 Gy计算的再次放疗的2 Gy等效剂量(EQD2)范围为34.5至84.0 Gy(中位值46.4)。11例患者接受了手术切除,14例患者在再次放疗时接受了同步化疗。3年局部无进展生存率为29.7%。3年总生存率为49.7%。多因素分析显示,再次放疗时同步化疗及再次放疗剂量>50 Gy EQD2是局部无进展生存和总生存的显著预后因素。90%(10例中的9例)有症状的患者再次放疗后症状改善。在可评估晚期毒性的23例患者中,12例出现晚期毒性反应。无4级晚期毒性反应,6例患者出现3级晚期毒性反应(小肠梗阻、肠穿孔和瘘)。
肛管直肠癌盆腔复发患者再次放疗可改善患者症状,但晚期毒性反应发生率较高。需要进一步研究以筛选合适的患者。
对于部分肛管直肠癌盆腔复发患者,再次放疗可作为一种可能的选择。