• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙加泰罗尼亚 2006 年至 2015 年妊娠期糖尿病患病率及围产结局变化趋势:Diagestcat 研究。

Trends in prevalence of gestational diabetes and perinatal outcomes in Catalonia, Spain, 2006 to 2015: the Diagestcat Study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Jul;35(5):e3151. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3151. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1002/dmrr.3151
PMID:30865356
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No recent epidemiologic studies on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been conducted in Spain. The present study aimed to explore trends in the prevalence of GDM and ascertain whether the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes changed between 2006 and 2015 in Catalonia.

METHODS

In this population-based study, all hospital admissions for singleton births in Catalonia for the period 2006 to 2015 were collected from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set. Cases of GDM were identified from hospital delivery discharge reports using ICD-9-CM codes. Data regarding maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes were analysed. Crude and age-adjusted annual prevalences were calculated. The Poisson regression model was used to assess trends in prevalence and perinatal outcomes, adjusted for age and smoking habit; however, they could not be adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Data from 743 762 deliveries were collected. GDM prevalence over the study period was 4.80% (95% CI 4.75-4.85%). Crude GDM prevalence rose from 3.81% (95% CI 3.67-3.95%) in 2006 to 6.53% (95% CI 6.33-6.72%) in 2015 (P < 0.001). Women with GDM showed a stable trend in rates of preeclampsia (2.56%), prematurity (15.7%), and large-for-gestational age (LGA) newborns (18.3%), whereas a lower rate of macrosomia was observed during the study period (from 9.16% to 7.84%). Caesarean deliveries rose from 28% to 31%; however, significance was lost after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of GDM in Catalonia almost doubled between 2006 and 2015. During the study period, the frequency of macrosomia decreased whereas pre-eclampsia, prematurity, LGA, and age-adjusted Caesarean rates remained stable.

摘要

背景

西班牙最近没有关于妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的流行病学研究。本研究旨在探讨 GDM 的流行趋势,并确定 2006 年至 2015 年期间加泰罗尼亚地区不良围产结局的风险是否发生了变化。

方法

在这项基于人群的研究中,从西班牙最低基本数据集收集了 2006 年至 2015 年加泰罗尼亚所有单胎分娩的住院病例。使用国际疾病分类第 9 版临床修正(ICD-9-CM)代码从医院分娩出院报告中确定 GDM 病例。分析了产妇特征和围产结局的数据。计算了粗患病率和年龄调整后的年患病率。使用泊松回归模型评估流行趋势和围产结局,调整了年龄和吸烟习惯;然而,它们不能调整体重指数(BMI)和种族。

结果

共收集了 743762 例分娩数据。研究期间 GDM 的患病率为 4.80%(95%CI 4.75-4.85%)。2006 年的粗 GDM 患病率为 3.81%(95%CI 3.67-3.95%),2015 年上升至 6.53%(95%CI 6.33-6.72%)(P<0.001)。患有 GDM 的女性子痫前期(2.56%)、早产(15.7%)和巨大儿(LGA)新生儿(18.3%)的发生率呈稳定趋势,而研究期间巨大儿的发生率较低(从 9.16%降至 7.84%)。剖宫产率从 28%上升到 31%;然而,调整后意义丧失。

结论

2006 年至 2015 年期间,加泰罗尼亚的 GDM 患病率几乎翻了一番。在研究期间,巨大儿的频率下降,而子痫前期、早产、LGA 和年龄调整后的剖宫产率保持稳定。

相似文献

1
Trends in prevalence of gestational diabetes and perinatal outcomes in Catalonia, Spain, 2006 to 2015: the Diagestcat Study.西班牙加泰罗尼亚 2006 年至 2015 年妊娠期糖尿病患病率及围产结局变化趋势:Diagestcat 研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Jul;35(5):e3151. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3151. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
Trends in prevalence of pre-existing diabetes and perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Catalonia, Spain, 2006-2015.既往糖尿病患病率及围产期结局的趋势:2006 - 2015年西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区一项基于人群的大型研究
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Oct;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001254.
3
Trends in Prevalence of Diabetes among Twin Pregnancies and Perinatal Outcomes in Catalonia between 2006 and 2015: The DIAGESTCAT Study.2006年至2015年加泰罗尼亚双胎妊娠糖尿病患病率趋势及围产期结局:DIAGESTCAT研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 30;10(9):1937. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091937.
4
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.辅助生殖技术受孕的单胎妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病的产科及围生期结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2115-4.
5
Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal changes in prevalence rates between 1979 and 2010.美国的妊娠期糖尿病:1979 年至 2010 年期间患病率的时间变化。
BJOG. 2017 Apr;124(5):804-813. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14236. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
6
Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 695,912 deliveries in France in 2018.根据孕期高血糖诊断时间的孕产妇和新生儿结局:对2018年法国695,912例分娩的全国性横断面研究。
Diabetologia. 2024 Mar;67(3):516-527. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06066-4. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes, and control pregnancies, in Kronoberg, Sweden.在瑞典 Kronoberg,患有糖尿病的妊娠和对照妊娠的产科和围产期结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 7;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2269-8.
8
Delivery outcomes of large-for-gestational-age newborns stratified by the presence or absence of gestational diabetes mellitus.将大于胎龄儿的分娩结局按有无妊娠期糖尿病进行分层。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Apr;141(1):120-125. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12387. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.母亲年龄与不良妊娠结局:一项队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;42(6):634-43. doi: 10.1002/uog.12494.
10
Impact of the IADPSG criteria for gestational diabetes, and of obesity, on pregnancy outcomes.国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)妊娠糖尿病诊断标准及肥胖对妊娠结局的影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;58(5):553-559. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12772. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The long-term general practice healthcare of women with a history of gestational diabetes: A Scoping Review Protocol.有妊娠期糖尿病病史女性的长期全科医疗保健:一项范围综述方案。
HRB Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;8:31. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14022.2. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of fetal sex on neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胎儿性别对妊娠期糖尿病女性新生儿结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07250-7.
3
The integrated bioinformatic analysis identifies immune microenvironment-related potential biomarkers for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.
综合生物信息学分析确定了与妊娠糖尿病患者免疫微环境相关的潜在生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 21;15:1296855. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1296855. eCollection 2024.
4
Gestational diabetes in Germany-prevalence, trend during the past decade and utilization of follow-up care: an observational study.德国的妊娠期糖尿病:患病率、过去十年的趋势及随访护理的利用情况:一项观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43382-6.
5
Expression of nutrient transporters in placentas affected by gestational diabetes: role of leptin.妊娠期糖尿病胎盘内营养转运体的表达:瘦素的作用。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 11;14:1172831. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1172831. eCollection 2023.
6
Association between second- and third-trimester maternal lipid profiles and adverse perinatal outcomes among women with GDM and non-GDM: a retrospective cohort study.妊娠期糖尿病和非妊娠期糖尿病妇女中孕中期和孕晚期血脂谱与不良围产结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 5;23(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05630-5.
7
Association between Maternal Blood Glucose Levels during Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: A Birth Cohort Study.妊娠期间母体血糖水平与分娩结局的关系:一项出生队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;20(3):2102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032102.
8
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century.21 世纪不同大陆妊娠期糖尿病的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315804.
9
Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期糖尿病与不良妊娠结局:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 May 25;377:e067946. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067946.
10
Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.不同类型的妊娠期糖尿病诊断标准对不良新生儿结局的影响:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Jul;46(4):605-619. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0178. Epub 2022 Mar 8.