Center for Effectiveness Research in Orthopaedics, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
ATI Physical Therapy, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1062-1067. doi: 10.1177/0363546519829765. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
Young age and contact sports have been postulated as risk factors for anterior shoulder instability. Management after shoulder instability is controversial, with studies suggesting that nonoperative management increases the risk of recurrence. Several studies examined return to play after an in-season instability episode, and few followed these patients to determine if they were able to successfully compete in a subsequent season. No study has evaluated this question in a high school athlete population.
To compare the likelihood of return to scholastic sport and complete the next full season without an additional time-loss injury among athletes with anterior shoulder instability in terms of treatment, instability type, and sport classification.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Athletes were included in this study as identified by a scholastic athletic trainer as experiencing a traumatic time-loss anterior shoulder instability injury related to school-sponsored participation. The cohort was predominantly male (n = 108, 84%) and consisted mostly of contact athletes (n = 101, 78%). All athletes had dislocation or subluxation diagnosed by a board-certified physician who determined the athlete's course of care (nonoperative vs operative). Successful treatment was defined as completion of care and return to the athlete's index sport, with full participation for the following season. Chi-square and relative risk analyses were completed to compare success of treatment (nonoperative vs operative care) and instability type. Separate logistic regressions were used to compare the effect of sex and sport classification on the athletes' ability to return to sport. Statistical significance was set a priori as α = .05.
Scholastic athletes (N = 129) received nonoperative (n = 97) or operative (n = 32) care. Nonoperatively treated (85%) and operatively treated (72%) athletes successfully returned to the same sport without injury for at least 1 full season ( P = .11). Players sustaining a dislocation were significantly more likely to fail to return when compared with those sustaining a subluxation (26% vs 89%, P = .013). Sex ( P = .85) and sport classification ( P = .74) did not influence the athlete's ability to return to sport, regardless of treatment type.
A high percentage of athletes with shoulder instability achieved successful return to sport without missing any additional time for shoulder injury. Those with subluxations were at almost 3 times the odds of a successful return compared with those sustaining a dislocation.
年轻和接触性运动被认为是前肩不稳定的危险因素。肩不稳定后的治疗存在争议,研究表明,非手术治疗会增加复发的风险。几项研究检查了赛季中不稳定事件后的重返赛场情况,很少有研究跟踪这些患者以确定他们是否能够成功参加下一个赛季。尚无研究在高中生运动员人群中评估这个问题。
比较前肩不稳定运动员在治疗、不稳定类型和运动分类方面重返校际运动并在下一个完整赛季无额外伤停的可能性。
队列研究;证据水平,2 级。
本研究通过学校运动训练员识别出经历与学校赞助参与相关的创伤性前肩不稳定损伤的运动员。该队列主要由男性(n=108,84%)组成,主要由接触性运动员(n=101,78%)组成。所有运动员的脱位或半脱位均由董事会认证的医生诊断,该医生确定了运动员的治疗方案(非手术与手术)。成功治疗定义为完成治疗并返回运动员的索引运动,在下一个赛季完全参与。完成卡方和相对风险分析以比较治疗(非手术与手术治疗)和不稳定类型的成功率。单独的逻辑回归用于比较性别和运动分类对运动员重返运动能力的影响。统计显著性预先设定为α=0.05。
学校运动员(N=129)接受非手术(n=97)或手术(n=32)治疗。非手术治疗(85%)和手术治疗(72%)的运动员成功返回相同的运动,且至少 1 个完整赛季无受伤(P=0.11)。与半脱位相比,脱位患者未能返回的可能性显著更高(26%比 89%,P=0.013)。性别(P=0.85)和运动分类(P=0.74)无论治疗类型如何,都不会影响运动员重返运动的能力。
前肩不稳定运动员中,有相当高比例的运动员成功重返运动,且无任何额外的肩部受伤时间。与脱位相比,半脱位患者成功回归的可能性几乎高出 3 倍。