Prada Carlos, Al-Mohrej Omar A, Patel Ashaka, Flood Breanne, Leroux Timothy, Khan Moin
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Dec;14(6):447-461. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09727-2. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the literature published over the past 5 years related to the management of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability.
During recent years, there has been a focus on patients at high risk for failure following soft tissue anterior stabilization (Bankart repair). A growing body of evidence suggests that anterior capsulolabral repair is insufficient in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss with an off-track Hill Sachs lesion. In such cases, the addition of a remplissage procedure to a Bankart repair or a bone-block augmentation to the glenoid (Latarjet, for example) is often advocated to decrease the risk of recurrent instability. Recent studies have also evaluated the role of alternative bone-block procedures in comparison to the Latarjet, outcomes with arthroscopic and open techniques as well as various fixation methods and radiological outcomes (bone graft resorption, glenohumeral osteoarthritis). Advances in our understanding of subcritical glenoid bone loss and the glenoid track concept have significantly impacted clinical decision making and treatment selection. The development of arthroscopic techniques has allowed for minimally invasive and safe arthroscopic bone-block procedures as an alternative to open procedures. Further research related to free bone-block procedures will inform long-term outcomes between these procedures and the gold standard Latarjet. Additionally, high-quality evidence is lacking to identify the ideal treatment for patients with glenoid subcritical glenoid bone defect. Variability in outcome reporting suggests the need to standardize outcome measures for future instability trials.
本范围综述的目的是概述过去5年发表的有关前肩不稳骨丢失管理的文献。
近年来,重点关注软组织前稳定术(Bankart修复术)后失败风险高的患者。越来越多的证据表明,在存在亚临界肩胛盂骨丢失且伴有脱轨的Hill-Sachs损伤的情况下,单纯前关节囊盂唇修复是不够的。在这种情况下,通常主张在Bankart修复术中加做 remplissage 手术或对肩胛盂进行骨块增强术(例如Latarjet手术),以降低复发性不稳的风险。最近的研究还比较了替代骨块手术与Latarjet手术的作用、关节镜和开放技术的疗效以及各种固定方法和放射学结果(骨移植吸收、盂肱关节炎)。我们对亚临界肩胛盂骨丢失和肩胛盂轨迹概念理解的进展显著影响了临床决策和治疗选择。关节镜技术的发展使得微创且安全的关节镜骨块手术成为开放手术的替代方法。与游离骨块手术相关的进一步研究将为这些手术与金标准Latarjet手术的长期疗效提供信息。此外,缺乏高质量证据来确定肩胛盂亚临界骨缺损患者的理想治疗方法。结果报告中的差异表明需要为未来的不稳试验标准化结果测量方法。