Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council Unit on Child & Adolescent Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e018277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018277.
Better understanding of psychosocial risk factors for food insecurity (FI) during pregnancy and how they interact is crucial, given long-term health implications for maternal and child health. We investigated the association between maternal childhood trauma as well as intimate partner violence (IPV) and FI among pregnant women in South Africa, in the Drakenstein Child Health Study, and whether maternal depression mediates these relationships.
Two primary care clinics in Paarl, South Africa.
992 pregnant women; inclusion criteria were clinic attendance and remaining in area for at least 1 year; women were excluded if a minor.
We examined psychosocial predictors of FI using multivariate regression. Mediation analyses investigated whether depression mediated the relationship between IPV and FI as well as between childhood trauma and FI, including disaggregation by two study communities. FI was assessed using an adapted US Department of Agriculture food security scale; households were coded as food insecure where 2 of 5 affirmative responses were recorded.
Among 992 pregnant women, there were high rates of IPV (7%-27%), depression (24%) and childhood trauma (34%). In multivariate cross-sectional analysis, emotional IPV (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.60; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.46), depression (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08) and childhood trauma (aOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.15) predicted FI. In mediation models, depression partially mediated the relationship between emotional IPV and FI as well as physical IPV and FI; depression partially mediated the relationship between childhood trauma and FI. Differing degrees of mediation were found when applied to communities.
Antenatal maternal depression, IPV and childhood trauma were highly prevalent and associated with FI. Depression, IPV and trauma screening services should be considered within routine antenatal care and may offer an opportunity to identify and intervene. Community-level differences in risk and in mediation analyses indicate that contextual tailoring of interventions may be important.
鉴于母婴健康的长期影响,更好地了解孕妇的社会心理风险因素以及它们之间的相互作用对于理解孕期的食物不安全问题至关重要。我们在南非的德肯斯坦儿童健康研究中调查了孕产妇童年创伤以及亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)与孕妇食物不安全之间的关系,并探讨了抑郁是否在这些关系中起中介作用。
南非帕尔的两个初级保健诊所。
992 名孕妇;纳入标准为在诊所就诊并在该地区至少居住 1 年;排除未成年人。
我们使用多变量回归分析了食物不安全的社会心理预测因素。中介分析调查了抑郁是否在 IPV 与食物不安全以及童年创伤与食物不安全之间起中介作用,包括按两个研究社区进行细分。采用美国农业部改良后的食物安全量表评估食物不安全情况;如果有 2 个及以上肯定回答,则家庭被编码为食物不安全。
在 992 名孕妇中,存在较高的 IPV(7%-27%)、抑郁(24%)和童年创伤(34%)发生率。在横断面多变量分析中,情感 IPV(调整后的比值比 [aOR] 1.60;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.04 至 2.46)、抑郁(aOR 1.05;95%CI 1.01 至 1.08)和童年创伤(aOR 1.52;95%CI 1.08 至 2.15)均预测了食物不安全。在中介模型中,抑郁部分中介了情感 IPV 与食物不安全以及 IPV 与食物不安全之间的关系;抑郁部分中介了童年创伤与食物不安全之间的关系。在应用于社区时,发现了不同程度的中介作用。
产前产妇抑郁、IPV 和童年创伤发生率高,且与食物不安全有关。在常规产前保健中应考虑抑郁、IPV 和创伤筛查服务,这可能为识别和干预提供机会。社区层面的风险和中介分析差异表明,有必要对干预措施进行情境调整。