Sundal Hildegunn, Petersen Karin Anna, Boge Jeanne
1Department of Health and Social Care, Molde University College, PO. Box 2110, 6402 Molde, Norway.
2Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Nurs. 2019 Mar 4;18:6. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0330-6. eCollection 2019.
Today, Norwegian parents have the right to stay with their children when they are in hospital. This right is relatively new. The purpose of this article is to examine the nursing profession's ideas on how parents should be included/excluded when their children are in hospital, and to examine the social and ideological conditions that made the nursing profession's ideas on inclusion/exclusion practices possible.
The analyses are done in the tradition of the French philosopher Michel Foucault's writings on how different kinds of knowledge have been used to discipline citizens. Such studies include analyses of descriptive and normative material and analyses of the ideological and social conditions that made the practices possible. The analyses are based on Norwegian textbooks on nursing.
Parents are rarely mentioned in Norwegian nursing textbooks from the period 1877-1940, and they are not present in photos from hospitals. The exclusion of parents may be due to the absence of welfare services and the fear of parents transmitting diseases from the hospitals to the general population.The first Norwegian nursing textbook that argued for the importance of letting parents visit their children in hospital was published in 1941. In 1968, nursing textbooks started to argue for parents' participation in the care. Since 1987, nursing textbooks have advocated full parental participation. The inclusion of parents was in accordance with humanistic ideology. The inclusion of parents occurred in a period of great nursing shortage. In this situation, it would have been of interest to entrust as much as possible of the nurse's work to the family.
Our conclusion is that ideas break through when they are in line with social conditions. From 1877 to 1940 social and economic conditions made it difficult for parents to be with their children in hospital, and hygiene ideology/theory contributed to legitimization of the exclusion of the parents in the care. During the period 1941-2017 it has been economically advantageous for the hospitals that parents care for their children. Ideas on the vulnerable child and self-help ideology have contributed to legitimization of the inclusion of the parents.
如今,挪威父母有权在孩子住院时陪伴在侧。这项权利相对较新。本文旨在探讨护理行业对于孩子住院期间父母应如何被纳入/排除的观点,并审视使得护理行业关于纳入/排除做法的观点成为可能的社会和思想条件。
分析是按照法国哲学家米歇尔·福柯关于不同类型知识如何被用于规训公民的著作传统进行的。此类研究包括对描述性和规范性材料的分析以及对使得这些做法成为可能的思想和社会条件的分析。分析基于挪威护理教材。
在1877年至1940年期间的挪威护理教材中,父母很少被提及,医院照片中也不见他们的身影。排除父母可能是由于缺乏福利服务以及担心父母将疾病从医院传播给普通民众。第一本主张让父母探望住院孩子重要性的挪威护理教材于1941年出版。1968年,护理教材开始主张父母参与护理。自1987年起,护理教材提倡父母全面参与。父母的纳入符合人文主义思想。父母的纳入发生在护理人员严重短缺的时期。在这种情况下,尽可能将护士的工作托付给家庭会是一件有意思的事。
我们的结论是,当观念与社会状况相符时就会突破。从1877年到1940年,社会和经济状况使得父母难以在医院陪伴孩子,卫生观念/理论促成了护理中排除父母做法的合法化。在1941年至2017年期间,父母照顾孩子对医院在经济上有利。关于弱势儿童的观念和自助思想促成了父母纳入做法的合法化。