Suppr超能文献

比较 3 天和 7 天的食物消费参考值回顾期,以用于食源性疾病暴发调查。

Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations.

机构信息

Public Health Agency of Canada,Guelph, ON,Canada.

Public Health Agency of Canada,Ottawa, ON,Canada.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e129. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818003370.

Abstract

Investigations into an outbreak of foodborne disease attempt to identify the source of illness as quickly as possible. Population-based reference values for food consumption can assist in investigation by providing comparison data for hypothesis generation and also strengthening the evidence associated with a food product through hypothesis testing. In 2014-2015 a national phone survey was conducted in Canada to collect data on food consumption patterns using a 3- or 7-day recall period. The resulting food consumption values over the two recall periods were compared. The majority of food products did not show a significant difference in the consumption over 3 days and 7 days. However, comparison of reference values from the 3-day recall period to data from an investigation into a Salmonella Infantis outbreak was shown to support the conclusion that chicken was the source of the outbreak whereas the reference values from a 7-day recall did not support this finding. Reference values from multiple recall periods can assist in the hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing phase of foodborne outbreak investigations.

摘要

对食源性疾病暴发的调查旨在尽快确定疾病的源头。基于人群的食物消费参考值可以通过提供假设生成的比较数据来协助调查,还可以通过假设检验来加强与食品相关的证据。2014-2015 年,加拿大进行了一项全国性电话调查,使用 3 天或 7 天的回顾期收集食物消费模式的数据。对这两个回顾期的食物消费值进行了比较。大多数食物产品在 3 天和 7 天的消费中没有显著差异。然而,将 3 天回顾期的参考值与婴儿沙门氏菌感染暴发调查的数据进行比较,结果表明鸡肉是暴发的源头,而 7 天回顾期的参考值则不支持这一发现。来自多个回顾期的参考值可协助食源性暴发调查的假设生成和假设检验阶段。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验