• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人会出现认知失调吗?一项针对健康老年人群体的诱导遵从性研究。

Does cognitive dissonance occur in older age? A study of induced compliance in a healthy elderly population.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2019 Aug;34(5):709-713. doi: 10.1037/pag0000338. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1037/pag0000338
PMID:30869928
Abstract

Does cognitive dissonance change as people age? Although cognitive dissonance has been one of the most widely studied theories in psychology, scant research has investigated the experience of dissonance over the life span and, to our knowledge, no prior research has investigated its effects in healthy older adults. The current study is the 1st empirical test of cognitive dissonance in an elderly population. We found that, consistent with dissonance theory, older adults showed effects of cognitive dissonance as measured by attitude differences in the direction of attitude-discrepant behavior in a classic induced compliance paradigm. Implications for the development of prohealth, dissonance-based interventions are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

随着人们年龄的增长,认知失调会改变吗?尽管认知失调是心理学中研究最广泛的理论之一,但很少有研究调查整个生命周期中的失调体验,据我们所知,也没有先前的研究调查其对健康老年人的影响。本研究是对老年人群体进行认知失调的首次实证检验。我们发现,与失调理论一致,老年人在经典的诱导顺从范式中表现出了与态度不一致的行为方向上的态度差异,这表明他们经历了认知失调。讨论了基于健康、基于失调的干预措施的发展的影响。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Does cognitive dissonance occur in older age? A study of induced compliance in a healthy elderly population.老年人会出现认知失调吗?一项针对健康老年人群体的诱导遵从性研究。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Aug;34(5):709-713. doi: 10.1037/pag0000338. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Dissonance reduction as emotion regulation: Attitude change is related to positive emotions in the induced compliance paradigm.减少不和谐作为情绪调节:在诱导服从范式中,态度改变与积极情绪有关。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 17;13(12):e0209012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209012. eCollection 2018.
3
The emotional and attitudinal consequences of religious hypocrisy: experimental evidence using a cognitive dissonance paradigm.宗教虚伪的情感和态度后果:使用认知失调范式的实验证据。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov-Dec;153(6):667-86. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2013.814620.
4
Do I Know What I'm Doing? Cognitive Dissonance and Action Identification Theory.我知道自己在做什么吗?认知失调与行动识别理论。
Span J Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;18:E97. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.93.
5
Religious concept activation attenuates cognitive dissonance reduction in free-choice and induced compliance paradigms.宗教观念的激活会减弱自由选择和诱导服从范式中的认知失调减少。
J Soc Psychol. 2020;160(1):75-91. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1609400. Epub 2019 May 5.
6
Double forced compliance: a new paradigm in cognitive dissonance theory.双重强制顺从:认知失调理论中的一种新范式。
J Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;131(6):839-45. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1991.9924671.
7
False memories for dissonance inducing events.对引发认知失调事件的错误记忆。
Memory. 2015;23(2):203-12. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.881501. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
8
Cognitive dissonance in groups: the consequences of disagreement.群体中的认知失调:分歧的后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):22-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.22.
9
Dissonance arousal: physiological evidence.失调唤醒:生理学证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983 Oct;45(4):782-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.45.4.782.
10
Influencing Republicans' and Democrats' attitudes toward Obamacare: Effects of imagined vicarious cognitive dissonance on political attitudes.影响共和党人和民主党人对《平价医疗法案》的态度:想象替代性认知失调对政治态度的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(1):112-117. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1465023. Epub 2018 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Wearable device adoption among older adults: A mixed-methods study.老年人对可穿戴设备的采用情况:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Dec;55:102209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102209. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.选择我们喜欢的与喜欢我们选择的:选择诱发偏好改变如何真正对决策起到工具性作用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0231081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231081. eCollection 2020.