• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格与功能中的情感、行为和认知:澄清经验重叠的项目内容方法。

Affect, behavior, and cognition in personality and functioning: An item-content approach to clarifying empirical overlap.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2019 Jul;31(7):905-912. doi: 10.1037/pas0000712. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000712
PMID:30869967
Abstract

The alternative model of personality disorder in the (5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), Section III, "Emerging Measures and Models," includes both personality dysfunction and pathological-range traits. However, the nature of personality dysfunction and its relation to pathological-range traits needs further explication. In existing measures, the personality constructs of traits and functioning are highly overlapping. For example, a joint factor analysis of a large set of such measures found 5 factors, 2 of which were composed of both trait and functioning scales (Clark & Ro, 2014); however, the basis for this comingling remains unclear. In this research, we explored whether the comingling was at least partly due to similarity in the scales' item content. Specifically, we examined the affective, behavioral, and cognitive (ABC) composition of 212 items, each of which was rated by subsets of 7 judges. Results indicated that personality trait and functioning scales that load on a common factor have ABC profiles that are similar to each other but distinct from those of scales loading on other factors. These results suggest that combined trait-and-functioning factors emerge partly because of similarities in their scales' item content, despite the fact that the constructs they were intended to assess are theoretically distinct. Thus, ABC profiles may represent basic characteristics of empirical trait-and-functioning factors, suggesting that our conceptualization and/or measurement of these constructs need revision. Drawing from classic trait theory, we suggest that traits and functioning may be complementary rather than distinct. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人格障碍的替代模型在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第五版)》(美国精神病学协会,2013 年)第三部分“新兴的测量和模型”中,包括人格功能障碍和病理性范围特征。然而,人格功能障碍的性质及其与病理性范围特征的关系需要进一步阐述。在现有的测量工具中,特质和功能的人格结构高度重叠。例如,对大量此类测量工具的联合因素分析发现了 5 个因素,其中 2 个因素由特质和功能量表组成(Clark & Ro,2014);然而,这种混合的基础尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们探讨了这种混合是否至少部分是由于量表项目内容的相似性。具体来说,我们检查了 212 个项目的情感、行为和认知(ABC)组成,每个项目都由 7 个评判小组中的一部分进行评分。结果表明,加载在共同因素上的人格特质和功能量表具有相似但又不同于其他因素加载量表的 ABC 特征。这些结果表明,共同的特质和功能因素的出现部分是由于它们的量表项目内容的相似性,尽管它们旨在评估的结构在理论上是不同的。因此,ABC 特征可能代表经验特质和功能因素的基本特征,这表明我们对这些结构的概念化和/或测量需要修正。借鉴经典的特质理论,我们认为特质和功能可能是互补的,而不是相互独立的。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Affect, behavior, and cognition in personality and functioning: An item-content approach to clarifying empirical overlap.人格与功能中的情感、行为和认知:澄清经验重叠的项目内容方法。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jul;31(7):905-912. doi: 10.1037/pas0000712. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
3
Initial development of pathological personality trait domain measures using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI).使用人格评估量表(PAI)初步开发病理性人格特质领域的测量方法。
Personal Disord. 2018 Nov;9(6):564-573. doi: 10.1037/per0000286. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Three-pronged assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder and its consequences: personality functioning, pathological traits, and psychosocial disability.人格障碍及其后果的三方面评估与诊断:人格功能、病理特质及社会心理残疾。
Personal Disord. 2014 Jan;5(1):55-69. doi: 10.1037/per0000063.
5
Examining the relations among the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, the five-factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior.探讨 DSM-5 人格替代模型、五因素模型以及外显和内隐行为之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):379-384. doi: 10.1037/per0000240. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
6
The twofold diagnosis of personality disorder: How do personality dysfunction and pathological traits increment each other at successive levels of the trait hierarchy?人格障碍的双重诊断:在特质层次结构的连续层面上,人格功能障碍和病理特质是如何相互促进的?
Personal Disord. 2016 Jul;7(3):280-92. doi: 10.1037/per0000149. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Correction to Clark and Ro (2014).对克拉克和罗(2014年)的修正。
Personal Disord. 2015 Jan;6(1):63. doi: 10.1037/per0000103. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
8
Personality disorder dysfunction versus traits: structural and conceptual issues.人格障碍功能障碍与特质:结构和概念问题。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):293-303. doi: 10.1037/per0000018. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
9
Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM-5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder model.比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第三部分人格病理学特质模型和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第二部分人格障碍模型的可靠性及其与功能的关联。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):228-236. doi: 10.1037/per0000213. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
10
Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.检验DSM-5人格障碍特质模型能否通过精简项目集进行测量:对《DSM-5人格问卷》的项目反应理论研究
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1195-210. doi: 10.1037/pas0000120. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Personality Change Follow Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients?帕金森病患者接受脑深部电刺激后人格会发生改变吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 30;12:643277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643277. eCollection 2021.
2
Building theories on top of, and not independent of, statistical models: The case of the -factor.基于统计模型而非独立于统计模型构建理论:以 - 因素为例。
Psychol Inq. 2020;31(4):310-320. doi: 10.1080/1047840x.2020.1853476. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Domain Specificity or Generality: Assessing the Chinese Implicit Theories Scale of Six Fundamental Psychological Attributes.
领域特异性或通用性:评估六种基本心理属性的中文内隐理论量表
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 11;11:142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00142. eCollection 2020.