California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):613-623. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003109.
To evaluate maternal and neonatal safety measures in a large-scale quality improvement program associated with reductions in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates.
This is a cross-sectional study of the 2015-2017 California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) statewide collaborative to support vaginal birth and reduce primary cesarean delivery. Hospitals with nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates greater than 23.9% were solicited to join. Fifty-six hospitals with more than 119,000 annual births participated; 87.5% were community facilities. Safety measures were derived using data collected as part of routine care and submitted monthly to CMQCC: birth certificates, maternal and neonatal discharge diagnosis and procedure files, and selected clinical data elements submitted as supplemental data files. Maternal measures included chorioamnionitis, blood transfusions, third- or fourth-degree lacerations, and operative vaginal delivery. Neonatal measures included the severe unexpected newborn complications metric and 5-minute Apgar scores less than 5. Mixed-effect multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (Ors) and 95% CIs.
Among collaborative hospitals, the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rate fell from 29.3% in 2015 to 25.0% in 2017 (2017 vs 2015 adjusted OR [aOR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.78). None of the six safety measures showed any difference comparing 2017 to 2015. As a sensitivity analysis, we examined the tercile of hospitals with the greatest decline (31.2%-20.6%, 2017 vs 2015 aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.58) to evaluate whether they had greater risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Again, no measure was statistically worse, and the severe unexpected newborn complications composite actually declined (3.2%-2.2%, aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92).
Mothers and neonates participating in a large-scale Supporting Vaginal Birth collaborative had no evidence of worsened birth outcomes, even in hospitals with large cesarean delivery rate reductions, supporting the safety of efforts to reduce primary cesarean delivery using American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine guidelines and enhanced labor support.
评估与降低初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率相关的大规模质量改进计划中的母婴安全措施。
这是一项对 2015-2017 年加利福尼亚州产妇质量护理合作组织(CMQCC)全州合作的横断面研究,旨在支持阴道分娩和降低初次剖宫产率。邀请初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率大于 23.9%的医院参加。有 56 家医院参与,每年分娩量超过 119000 例;87.5%为社区医疗机构。安全措施是使用作为常规护理的一部分收集的数据得出的,并每月向 CMQCC 提交:出生证明、产妇和新生儿出院诊断和程序文件,以及作为补充数据文件提交的选定临床数据元素。产妇措施包括绒毛膜羊膜炎、输血、三度或四度裂伤和阴道助产分娩。新生儿措施包括严重意外新生儿并发症指标和 5 分钟 Apgar 评分低于 5 分。采用混合效应多变量逻辑回归模型计算比值比(ORs)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
在合作医院中,初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率从 2015 年的 29.3%降至 2017 年的 25.0%(2017 年与 2015 年调整后的 OR [aOR] 0.76,95%CI 0.73-0.78)。在比较 2017 年和 2015 年时,没有任何一项安全措施显示出任何差异。作为敏感性分析,我们检查了降幅最大的医院(31.2%-20.6%,2017 年与 2015 年 aOR 0.54,95%CI 0.50-0.58)的 tertile,以评估它们是否存在不良母婴结局的更大风险。同样,没有任何一项措施在统计学上更差,严重的意外新生儿并发症综合实际上有所下降(3.2%-2.2%,aOR 0.71,95%CI 0.55-0.92)。
参与大规模支持阴道分娩合作的母亲和新生儿没有证据表明分娩结局恶化,即使在剖宫产率大幅下降的医院也是如此,这支持了根据美国妇产科医师学会和母胎医学学会指南以及增强产时支持来降低初次剖宫产率的安全性。