• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估四种商业化的提取-定量系统,以监测全血中的 EBV 或 CMV 病毒载量。

Evaluation of four commercial extraction-quantification systems to monitor EBV or CMV viral load in whole blood.

机构信息

CHU de Rouen, Laboratoire de Virologie, F-76000 Rouen, France.

CHU de Rouen, Laboratoire de Virologie, F-76000 Rouen, France.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2019 Apr;113:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.001
PMID:30870646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral loads is commonly used to monitor posttransplant patients. Two new systems (eMAG/eSTREAM and Versant/kPCR) have been recently commercialized.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of four systems to quantify CMV and EBV in whole blood.

STUDY DESIGN

Three extraction and real-time PCR amplification systems: m2000SP/RT (M2000), eMAG/eSTREAM (EMAG), and Versant/kPCR (KPCR) were compared with our routine system Qiasymphony/RGQ (QS/RGQ). The 4 systems were tested using 3 dilutions in triplicate according to the WHO international standard (WHO-IS) for intra-assay reproducibility; 56 whole blood samples (24 patients, 4 follow-ups) for CMV and 45 samples (27 patients, 3 follow-ups) for EBV.

RESULTS

For CMV, the mean of the WHO-IS (expected value: 4.7 Log IU/ml) was: QS/RGQ=4.84, M2000=4.61, EMAG=4.33, and KPCR=4.79. One patient (10 samples) presented a major underquantification by QS/RGQ. Of the 46 remaining samples, 41 were quantified with QS/RGQ, 43 with M2000, 33 with EMAG and 24 with KPCR. For EBV, the mean of the WHO-IS was: QS/RGQ=4.70, M2000=4.61, EMAG=4.62, and KPCR=4.57. Among the 45 samples, 43 were quantified with QS/RGQ, 39 with M2000, 40 with EMAG and 32 with KPCR.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained with the WHO-IS were very good. The results of patients' samples were well correlated with the announced sensitivity of each system. The elevated threshold of the KPCR CMV assay may be problematic for the follow-up of highly immunocompromised patients who require early introduction of treatment.

摘要

背景

巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 和 Epstein-Barr 病毒 (EBV) 病毒载量的测量常用于监测移植后患者。两个新系统(eMAG/eSTREAM 和 Versant/kPCR)最近已商业化。

目的

评估四种系统定量检测全血中 CMV 和 EBV 的性能。

研究设计

三种提取和实时 PCR 扩增系统:m2000SP/RT (M2000)、eMAG/eSTREAM (EMAG) 和 Versant/kPCR (KPCR) 与我们的常规系统 Qiasymphony/RGQ (QS/RGQ) 进行了比较。根据世界卫生组织国际标准 (WHO-IS) 进行了三次重复稀释试验,以评估各系统的批内可重复性;使用 56 份全血样本(24 例患者,4 次随访)进行 CMV 检测,使用 45 份样本(27 例患者,3 次随访)进行 EBV 检测。

结果

对于 CMV,WHO-IS 的平均值(预期值:4.7 Log IU/ml)为:QS/RGQ=4.84,M2000=4.61,EMAG=4.33,KPCR=4.79。一名患者(10 份样本)的 QS/RGQ 检测结果明显偏低。在其余 46 份样本中,41 份样本可被 QS/RGQ 定量检测,43 份样本可被 M2000 定量检测,33 份样本可被 EMAG 定量检测,24 份样本可被 KPCR 定量检测。对于 EBV,WHO-IS 的平均值为:QS/RGQ=4.70,M2000=4.61,EMAG=4.62,KPCR=4.57。在 45 份样本中,43 份样本可被 QS/RGQ 定量检测,39 份样本可被 M2000 定量检测,40 份样本可被 EMAG 定量检测,32 份样本可被 KPCR 定量检测。

结论

使用 WHO-IS 获得的结果非常好。患者样本的结果与每个系统公布的灵敏度高度相关。KPCR CMV 检测的高阈值可能会给需要早期引入治疗的高度免疫抑制患者的后续治疗带来问题。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of four commercial extraction-quantification systems to monitor EBV or CMV viral load in whole blood.评估四种商业化的提取-定量系统,以监测全血中的 EBV 或 CMV 病毒载量。
J Clin Virol. 2019 Apr;113:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
2
Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Detecting Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Using Real-Time PCR: A Comparison Study Between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube Systems.使用实时荧光定量PCR检测巨细胞病毒和EB病毒的自动化核酸提取系统:QIAsymphony RGQ系统与QIAcube系统的比较研究
Ann Lab Med. 2017 Mar;37(2):129-136. doi: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.2.129.
3
Analytical and Clinical Performance of the NeuMoDx™ Platform for Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Viral Load Testing.NeuMoDx™ 平台用于巨细胞病毒和 Epstein-Barr 病毒病毒载量检测的分析和临床性能。
Viruses. 2024 Apr 25;16(5):671. doi: 10.3390/v16050671.
4
[Comparison of Two Commercial Quantitative Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Polymerase Chain Reaction Tests Calibrated by World Health Organization International CMV Standard].[两种经世界卫生组织国际巨细胞病毒标准校准的商用定量巨细胞病毒(CMV)聚合酶链反应检测方法的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Apr;54(2):257-265. doi: 10.5578/mb.68628.
5
Evaluation of the sample-to-result, random access NeuMoDx platform for viral load testing of Cytomegalovirus and Epstein Barr virus in clinical specimens.用于临床样本中巨细胞病毒和爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒病毒载量检测的样本到结果随机存取NeuMoDx平台的评估。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Apr;149:105122. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105122. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
6
Simultaneous quantification of Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and human herpesvirus 6 DNA in samples from transplant recipients by multiplex real-time PCR assay.通过多重实时聚合酶链反应法同时定量检测移植受者样本中的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒、巨细胞病毒和人疱疹病毒6型DNA。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 May;45(5):1426-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01515-06. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
7
Performance Evaluation of the Fully Automated NeuMoDx RT-PCR Platform for the Quantification of CMV and EBV DNA in EDTA Plasma: Implications for Clinical Management and Establishment of a Conversion Formula.全自动化 NeuMoDx RT-PCR 平台对 EDTA 血浆中 CMV 和 EBV DNA 定量的性能评估:对临床管理的影响和转换公式的建立。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0215722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02157-22. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Multicenter comparison of laboratory performance in cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus viral load testing using international standards.使用国际标准对巨细胞病毒和EB病毒病毒载量检测中的实验室性能进行多中心比较。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Dec;28(12):1416-23. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12473. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Comparison of the QIAGEN artus HBV QS-RGQ Assay With the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HBV Assay for Quantifying Viral DNA in Sera of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.用于定量慢性乙型肝炎患者血清中病毒DNA的QIAGEN artus HBV QS-RGQ检测法与罗氏COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HBV检测法的比较
Ann Lab Med. 2017 May;37(3):248-253. doi: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.3.248.
10
Comparison of two commercial quantitative PCR assays and correlation with the first WHO International Standard for human CMV.两种商业定量PCR检测方法的比较及其与世界卫生组织首个人类巨细胞病毒国际标准的相关性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 May;91(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.021. Epub 2018 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Analytical and Clinical Performance of the NeuMoDx™ Platform for Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Viral Load Testing.NeuMoDx™ 平台用于巨细胞病毒和 Epstein-Barr 病毒病毒载量检测的分析和临床性能。
Viruses. 2024 Apr 25;16(5):671. doi: 10.3390/v16050671.
2
Detection of low-load Epstein-Barr virus in blood samples by enriched recombinase aided amplification assay.通过富集重组酶辅助扩增检测血液样本中的低载量爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒。
AMB Express. 2022 Jun 11;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13568-022-01415-9.