School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Cortex. 2019 Jun;115:246-263. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
Prism adaptation (PA) after-effects are assessed using tests that measure changes in sensorimotor systems. After-effects on pointing without feedback to a visual target (open loop pointing - OLP) are traditionally described as being larger than those measured by straight ahead pointing (SAP) with eyes closed, and the difference between them is attributed to a shift in visual localisation. However, neither differences between OLP and SAP, nor shifts in perceptual judgement of visual straight ahead (VSA), are consistently reported. Moreover, since very few studies have directly recorded direction of gaze, an effect of PA on the state estimate of gaze direction has not been reliably documented. The current research aimed to isolate the effects of PA on state estimates of eye position. We measured sensorimotor after-effects through common (OLP, SAP, and VSA) measures, and also recorded eye position and additional after-effect measures to interrogate changes to the oculomotor system and how these might relate to other measures of sensorimotor change. To ascertain if PA's effects on estimates of eye position could be attributed to eye muscle potentiation, we compared the effects of PA to sustained gaze deviation without adaptation. PA induced no effect on visual straight-ahead and no change in direction of gaze, when measured while positioning a target, looking straight ahead in the dark, or looking toward the passively positioned and occluded unexposed hand. We also found that after-effects measured by SAP with the eyes open were larger than SAP with the eyes closed and equal to those observed with OLP. The findings challenge the concept that total adaptation after-effect is a direct sum of arm proprioceptive and visual after-effects as conventionally measured, and suggest that the oculomotor system is altered by prism adaptation only in interaction with an arm motor command when vision is available.
棱镜适应(PA)后效通过测量感觉运动系统变化的测试来评估。在没有视觉目标反馈的情况下进行指向(开环指向 - OLP)的后效传统上被描述为比闭眼进行的直接指向(SAP)更大,而它们之间的差异归因于视觉定位的变化。然而,OLP 和 SAP 之间的差异,以及对视觉正前方(VSA)的感知判断的变化,并没有得到一致的报告。此外,由于很少有研究直接记录注视方向,PA 对视向状态估计的影响尚未得到可靠记录。当前的研究旨在分离 PA 对视向状态估计的影响。我们通过常见的(OLP、SAP 和 VSA)测量来测量感觉运动后效,同时还记录了眼位和其他后效测量,以探究对眼动系统的影响,以及这些如何与其他感觉运动变化的测量相关。为了确定 PA 对眼位估计的影响是否可以归因于眼肌增强,我们将 PA 的影响与没有适应的持续凝视偏差进行了比较。当在定位目标、在黑暗中直视或看向被动定位和遮挡的未暴露手时,PA 对视觉正前方没有影响,也没有改变注视方向。我们还发现,与闭眼 SAP 相比,睁眼 SAP 的后效更大,与 OLP 观察到的后效相等。这些发现挑战了传统上认为总适应后效是臂本体感觉和视觉后效的直接总和的概念,并表明只有在视觉可用时,与手臂运动指令相互作用时,眼动系统才会因棱镜适应而改变。