Hatada Yohko, Miall R Chris, Rossetti Yves
INSERM Unit 534, Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences de Lyon: Espace et Action, Bron, France.
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;174(1):189-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0437-3. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
We aimed to dissociate components in prism adaptation and its aftereffect by using prism adaptation training in healthy humans. Arm proprioceptive aftereffects are usually measured by indicating the subjective straight ahead direction with eyes closed (S). This measure however could be affected by other components besides proprioception, such as an efferent motor component and internal egocentric reference frame. Here we report a very long lasting proprioceptive shift, detected by two measuring methods, that is a component of the adaptation aftereffects to left wedge prism glasses. In order to minimize possible active motor components, arm passive proprioceptive midsagittal judgment was measured (P). The subject's arm was passively brought from the right or left lateral position, and stopped by subjects' verbal order. The results from these different measurements of midsagittal judgment were compared for 7 days after prism adaptation. Surprisingly, we found two distinctly separate aftereffects of proprioceptive shift depending on the directions of the passive arm movement. The shift of the midsagittal plane appeared only when tested from the left (Pl). This indicates that our strong prism adaptation procedure affected proprioception in a directionally biased way and not a spatially ubiquitous way. Further, the early aftereffect seen in active straight ahead pointing (S) was mostly similar to this biased shift in proprioception (Pl). However the long lasting aftereffect in straight ahead pointing was independently maintained up to day 7, when the passive proprioception had returned to pretest level. These results indicate that active straight ahead pointing (S) involves other components in addition to the passively measurable proprioceptive component. We suggest a late onset shift in the internal egocentric reference frame is involved in S. Possible neural mechanisms for these phenomena are discussed.
我们旨在通过对健康人进行棱镜适应训练来区分棱镜适应及其后效中的各个成分。手臂本体感觉后效通常通过闭眼指示主观正前方方向(S)来测量。然而,这一测量方法可能会受到除本体感觉之外的其他成分的影响,比如传出运动成分和内部自我中心参考框架。在此,我们报告了一种通过两种测量方法检测到的非常持久的本体感觉偏移,它是左楔形棱镜眼镜适应后效的一个成分。为了尽量减少可能的主动运动成分,我们测量了手臂被动本体感觉矢状面中点判断(P)。受试者的手臂从右侧或左侧横向位置被被动移动,并根据受试者的口头指令停止。在棱镜适应后的7天内,对这些矢状面中点判断的不同测量结果进行了比较。令人惊讶的是,我们发现根据被动手臂运动方向,本体感觉偏移有两种明显不同的后效。矢状面的偏移仅在从左侧测试时出现(Pl)。这表明我们强烈的棱镜适应程序以方向偏向的方式而非空间普遍的方式影响本体感觉。此外,主动向前指示(S)中出现的早期后效大多与这种本体感觉的偏向性偏移(Pl)相似。然而,向前指示中的持久后效在第7天之前一直独立维持,此时被动本体感觉已恢复到测试前水平。这些结果表明,主动向前指示(S)除了包含可被动测量的本体感觉成分外,还涉及其他成分。我们认为内部自我中心参考框架中存在一个延迟出现的偏移与S有关。并对这些现象可能的神经机制进行了讨论。