Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15;6(4):720-728. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
A significant number of patients who require surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia are under either anticoagulation (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) therapy.
To assess the efficacy and morbidity of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) in patients who required AC/AP therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included 296 (67.6%) and 142 (32.4%) patients who underwent HoLEP and B-TUEP, respectively. The AC/AP group included patients whose AP therapy was not interrupted pre-, peri-, and/or postoperatively, and patients who underwent perioperative AC therapy bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin.
HoLEP and B-TUEP.
We tested the hypothesis that AC/AP therapy had a limited impact on the efficacy of HoLEP and B-TUEP. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity-score matching was performed. Clinical characteristics were compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square test. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between clinical variables and the odds of Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications after surgery.
Overall, 28 (9.5%) and 46 (15.5%) patients in the HoLEP group and 15 (10.5%) and 24 (16.9%) men in the B-TUEP group had AC and AP therapy, respectively (p=0.9). HoLEP patients under either AC or AP therapy deserved longer catheter maintenance and a longer hospital stay (HS) than those without AC/AP therapy (all p≤0.01). Operative time, rates of postoperative complications, and 2-mo International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) were similar between patients with and without AC/CP. Among B-TUEP patients, HS was longer (p=0.03) and the rate of complications was higher (p<0.001) in patients under AC or AP therapy. Postoperative haemoglobin drop and 2-mo IPSS were similar among groups and surgical techniques. Limitations are the retrospective nature of the study, and the lack of long-term complications and functional outcomes.
HoLEP and B-TUEP can safely be performed in patients deserving continuous AP/AC therapy with only a slight increase in HS and catheterisation time.
We assessed the safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) in men under chronic anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy. Both HoLEP and B-TUEP could safely be performed as minimally invasive treatment options in this subset of patients at a high risk of bleeding from benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery.
许多需要手术治疗良性前列腺增生的患者正在接受抗凝(AC)或抗血小板(AP)治疗。
评估钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)和双极经尿道前列腺剜除术(B-TUEP)在需要 AC/AP 治疗的患者中的疗效和发病率。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究包括分别接受 HoLEP 和 B-TUEP 治疗的 296(67.6%)和 142(32.4%)例患者。AC/AP 组包括术前、术中和/或术后未中断 AP 治疗的患者,以及接受低分子量肝素桥接围手术期 AC 治疗的患者。
HoLEP 和 B-TUEP。
我们检验了 AC/AP 治疗对 HoLEP 和 B-TUEP 疗效影响有限的假设。为了调整潜在的基线混杂因素,进行了倾向评分匹配。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 或卡方检验比较组间的临床特征。Logistic 回归分析测试了临床变量与术后 Clavien-Dindo≥2 并发症发生几率之间的关联。
总体而言,HoLEP 组中有 28(9.5%)例和 B-TUEP 组中有 46(15.5%)例患者接受了 AC 和 AP 治疗,HoLEP 组中有 15(10.5%)例和 B-TUEP 组中有 24(16.9%)例患者接受了 AP 治疗(p=0.9)。接受 AC 或 AP 治疗的 HoLEP 患者需要更长时间的导管维持和住院时间(HS)(均 p≤0.01)。接受 AC/CP 治疗的患者与未接受 AC/CP 治疗的患者相比,手术时间、术后并发症发生率和 2 个月国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)相似。在 B-TUEP 患者中,接受 AC 或 AP 治疗的患者 HS 时间更长(p=0.03),并发症发生率更高(p<0.001)。各组和手术技术之间的术后血红蛋白下降和 2 个月 IPSS 相似。研究的局限性为回顾性研究,缺乏长期并发症和功能结局。
HoLEP 和 B-TUEP 可安全用于需要持续 AP/AC 治疗的患者,仅略微增加 HS 和导管插入时间。
我们评估了在接受慢性抗凝/抗血小板治疗的男性中,钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)和双极经尿道前列腺剜除术(B-TUEP)的安全性和疗效。HoLEP 和 B-TUEP 都可以作为有出血高风险的良性前列腺增生手术患者的微创治疗选择。