Stamm J M, Hanson C W, Chu D T, Bailer R, Vojtko C, Fernandes P B
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):193-200. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.2.193.
The in vitro antibacterial potencies of A-56619 and A-56620, two new aryl-fluoroquinolones, were compared with the potency of norfloxacin against a broad spectrum of organisms. Cefotaxime, aztreonam, piperacillin, imipenem, penicillin, and gentamicin were also tested for reference purposes. The MICs required to inhibit at least 90% of the strains tested ranged from 0.25 to 4 micrograms/ml for A-56619 and from 0.06 to 0.5 microgram/ml for A-56620 for members of the Enterobacteriaceae. A-56619 was generally twofold less potent and A-56620 was twofold more potent than norfloxacin against most aerobic gram-negative bacilli, including members of the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Against indole-positive Proteus, Morganella, Providencia rettgeri, and Serratia strains, A-56619 was at least 8- to 16-fold less potent than norfloxacin. A-56619 and A-56620 were four- to eightfold more potent than norfloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and equally potent to fourfold more potent against Streptococcus species, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The MICs of A-56619 and A-56620 were only slightly affected by increased inoculum size or by the addition of various cations at physiologic concentrations. A-56619 was three- to fivefold less active at pH 8.0 than at pH 6.5 or 7.2. A-56620 was twofold less active at pH 6.5 than at pH 8.0 or 7.2 against members of the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; similar pH variations did not affect A-56620 activity against gram-positive cocci. The potencies of A-56619, A-56620, and norfloxacin were less in urine than in Mueller-Hinton broth; however, this effect was more pronounced with norfloxacin. Human serum at a concentration of 50% caused a 4- to 64- fold decrease in the potency of A-56619 and an average 4-fold decrease in the potency of A-56620, compared with no effect on the potency of norfloxacin. A-56619, A-56620, and norfloxacin were bactericidal and, at four times the MIC, reduced the viable cell counts of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by approximately 99.9% within 2 h. A-56619, A-56620, and norfloxacin showed no significant synergistic activity and no antagonism when they were aminoglycoside or beta-lactam antimicrobial agents.
将两种新型芳基氟喹诺酮类药物A - 56619和A - 56620的体外抗菌效力与诺氟沙星对多种微生物的效力进行了比较。还测试了头孢噻肟、氨曲南、哌拉西林、亚胺培南、青霉素和庆大霉素作为参考。对于肠杆菌科细菌,抑制至少90%受试菌株所需的最低抑菌浓度(MIC),A - 56619为0.25至4微克/毫升,A - 56620为0.06至0.5微克/毫升。对于大多数需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌,包括肠杆菌科细菌和铜绿假单胞菌,A - 56619的效力通常比诺氟沙星低两倍,A - 56620的效力比诺氟沙星高两倍。对于吲哚阳性变形杆菌、摩根氏菌、雷氏普罗威登斯菌和沙雷氏菌属菌株,A - 56619的效力比诺氟沙星至少低8至16倍。A - 56619和A - 56620对金黄色葡萄球菌的效力比诺氟沙星高4至8倍,对链球菌属、流感嗜血杆菌和淋病奈瑟菌的效力与诺氟沙星相当或高4倍。A - 56619和A - 56620的MIC仅受接种量增加或生理浓度的各种阳离子添加的轻微影响。A - 56619在pH 8.0时的活性比在pH 6.5或7.2时低三至五倍。对于肠杆菌科细菌和铜绿假单胞菌,A - 56620在pH 6.5时的活性比在pH 8.0或7.2时低两倍;类似的pH变化不影响A - 56620对革兰氏阳性球菌的活性。A - 56619、A - 56620和诺氟沙星在尿液中的效力低于在 Mueller - Hinton肉汤中的效力;然而,这种影响在诺氟沙星中更为明显。与对诺氟沙星的效力无影响相比,浓度为50%的人血清使A - 56619的效力降低4至64倍,使A - 56620的效力平均降低4倍。A - 56619、A - 56620和诺氟沙星具有杀菌作用,且在四倍MIC浓度下,在2小时内可使大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的活菌数减少约99.9%。当A - 56619、A - 56620和诺氟沙星与氨基糖苷类或β - 内酰胺类抗菌药物联用时,未显示出显著的协同活性,也无拮抗作用。