Delafosse Arnaud, Meens Eric, Rambaud Thomas, Hanoy François, Achour Hamid
Groupement de Défense Sanitaire de l'Orne, BP 138, Alençon, F-61004, France (Delafosse, Hanoy); Groupement de Défense contre les Maladies des Animaux de Seine-Maritime, BP 516, Bois-Guillaume, F-76233, France (Meens); Laboratoire Vétérinaire Départemental de Seine-Maritime, CS 51140, Rouen, F-76175, France (Rambaud); Laboratoire Vétérinaire Départemental de l'Orne, CS 60007, Alençon, F-61001, France (Achour).
Can Vet J. 2019 Mar;60(3):275-281.
This study evaluated an ELISA on bulk tank milk (BTM) samples and a qPCR on a single composite fecal sample to detect paratuberculosis seropositive cattle dairy herds. Individual serum ( = 15 372), BTM and composite fecal samples were obtained from 192 herds. The within-herd apparent seroprevalence was categorized and compared with BTM ELISA and fecal qPCR results. The BTM ELISA had poor overall sensitivity (16%) to detect seropositive herds but higher sensitivity (53%) in the higher apparent seroprevalence group of > 9%. Using an optimized cut-off point (5.0% S/P), sensitivities overall and in the high apparent seroprevalence group were 53% and 88%, respectively. The BTM ELISA gave 5% positive results in seronegative herds and 25% using the optimized cut-off. Fecal qPCR had 72% sensitivity to detect seropositive herds and 88% in the higher apparent seroprevalence group, but gave 25% positive results in fully seronegative herds. The combination of BTM ELISA and composite fecal qPCR improved the sensitivity to detect seropositive herds.
本研究评估了用于检测散装罐奶(BTM)样本的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和用于单个混合粪便样本的定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR),以检测副结核病血清阳性奶牛群。从192个牛群中采集了个体血清(n = 15372)、BTM和混合粪便样本。对牛群内的表观血清阳性率进行分类,并与BTM ELISA和粪便qPCR结果进行比较。BTM ELISA检测血清阳性牛群的总体敏感性较差(16%),但在表观血清阳性率>9%的较高表观血清阳性率组中敏感性较高(53%)。使用优化的临界值(5.0% S/P)时,总体敏感性和高表观血清阳性率组的敏感性分别为53%和88%。BTM ELISA在血清阴性牛群中的阳性结果为5%,使用优化临界值时为25%。粪便qPCR检测血清阳性牛群的敏感性为72%,在较高表观血清阳性率组中为88%,但在完全血清阴性的牛群中的阳性结果为25%。BTM ELISA和混合粪便qPCR相结合提高了检测血清阳性牛群的敏感性。