Ho Warren, Lin Seow Liang, Musawi Ammar
Drs. Wong & Partner Dental Surgeons, KualaLumpur, Malaysia.
International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Clin Transl Res. 2018 Apr 12;4(1):70-74. eCollection 2018 May 28.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of different viscosities of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression materials on the accuracy of the stone die produced.
A three-unit bridge master model was fabricated using cold-cure acrylic resin. Four combinations of different viscosities of PVS impression materials - regular body (monophase) alone, light body with regular body, light body with heavy body, and light body with putty - were used to make an impression of the master model. Ten impressions from each group were taken and Type IV gypsum stone was used to generate the dies. The dies were measured at the inter-abutment distance, occlusogingival length, and shoulder width with a measuring microscope and were compared with the master model using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey (honest significant difference) test.
Differences were found for inter-abutment distance between the master model and the light body with regular body and light body with putty dies (both < 0.02). A difference was found for shoulder width between the master model and the regular body alone die (P = 0.01). No differences were found for occlusogingival distance (all > 0.08).
Results suggested inter-abutment distance was most accurate when using a PVS light body combination. Occlusogingival length was accurate using any of the studied PVS combinations, and shoulder width was more accurate when using the regular body PVS.
These results should be considered when choosing the viscosity of the PVS to use for producing impressions of high accuracy and fabricating a well-fitting fixed prosthesis.
本研究的目的是调查不同粘度的聚乙烯基硅氧烷(PVS)印模材料对所制作的石膏模型精度的影响。
使用冷固化丙烯酸树脂制作一个三单位桥体主模型。采用四种不同粘度的PVS印模材料组合——单独使用常规型(单相)、轻体与常规型组合、轻体与重体组合以及轻体与油灰型组合——对主模型进行印模制取。每组制取十个印模,并使用IV型石膏制作模型。使用测量显微镜在基牙间距离、咬合龈向长度和肩台宽度方面对模型进行测量,并通过单因素方差分析和Tukey(诚实显著性差异)检验与主模型进行比较。
发现主模型与轻体与常规型组合以及轻体与油灰型组合的模型在基牙间距离上存在差异(两者均<0.02)。发现主模型与单独使用常规型的模型在肩台宽度上存在差异(P = 0.01)。在咬合龈向距离上未发现差异(均>0.08)。
结果表明,使用PVS轻体组合时基牙间距离最准确。使用任何一种所研究的PVS组合时咬合龈向长度都准确,而使用常规型PVS时肩台宽度更准确。
在选择PVS粘度以制取高精度印模和制作贴合良好的固定修复体时,应考虑这些结果。