Sindi Abdulelah Sameer, Otudi Hanan Salem A, Muslihi Asma Ahmed A, Althurwi Roaa Abdu, Sayed Mohammed E, Al-Makramani Bandar M A, Al-Sanabani Fuad A, Ageel Mohammad Abker Ahmed, Jawbahi Sultan A Y, Kumar Lakshya, Bin Hassan Saeed Awod, Al Malwi Ahmed Abdullah, Kaleem Sultan Mohammed, Mattoo Khurshid
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Intern Clinics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 14;31:e946537. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946537.
BACKGROUND A tooth preparation's clinical requirements and geometric configurations should take precedence over material characteristics when advocating for putty reline impression techniques for permanent restorations, since they require a technically sensitive spacer for light body elastomer. We evaluated the linear dimensional accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane-based putty reline impressions with different spacer acquisition techniques in short-span and long-span fixed partial dentures (FPD). MATERIAL AND METHODS A typodont tooth set simulated a 3-unit (short-span) and a 5-unit (long-span) FPD. Between respective prepared abutments, 31 coordinates were identified and measured based on angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat). Sixty impressions (dual stage 2-step putty reline technique) were divided into 5 groups (n=12/group): group PP (pre-preparation putty), group GP (gouging putty), group PS (polythene spacer), group CT (conventional temporary), and group MT (modified temporary), depending on spacer acquisition method. Coordinates measurements were conducted using a measuring microscope. Descriptive and inferential statistical tests (ANOVA, post hoc Tukey) determined between-group and within-group differences, at P≤0.05 significance level. RESULTS In short-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were GP (4 coordinates), PP (2 coordinates), and PS, CT, and MT (1 each). In long-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were group GP (12 coordinates), group PP (10 coordinates), group PS (5 coordinates), and group CT and group MT (4 each). CONCLUSIONS Different spacer acquisition methods produce varied thickness of spacers for relining of putty. CT and MT, when used as spacers, provided maximum accurate coordinates for angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat).
背景 在倡导使用油灰重衬印模技术进行永久性修复时,牙齿预备的临床要求和几何构型应优先于材料特性,因为这些技术需要用于轻质体弹性体的技术敏感型间隔物。我们评估了在短跨度和长跨度固定局部义齿(FPD)中,采用不同间隔物获取技术的乙烯基聚硅氧烷基油灰重衬印模的线性尺寸精度。
材料与方法 一组典型牙模拟了一个3单位(短跨度)和一个5单位(长跨度)的FPD。在各自预备的基牙之间,基于角度(线/点)和表面(弯曲/平坦)确定并测量了31个坐标。60个印模(双阶段两步油灰重衬技术)根据间隔物获取方法分为5组(每组n = 12):PP组(预备前油灰)、GP组(挖槽油灰)、PS组(聚乙烯间隔物)、CT组(传统临时材料)和MT组(改良临时材料)。使用测量显微镜进行坐标测量。描述性和推断性统计检验(方差分析、事后Tukey检验)确定组间和组内差异,显著性水平为P≤0.05。
结果 在短跨度FPD中,与对照组相比,各组中坐标有显著差异的数量分别为:GP组(4个坐标)、PP组(2个坐标)、PS组、CT组和MT组(各1个)。在长跨度FPD中,与对照组相比,各组中坐标有显著差异的数量分别为:GP组(12个坐标)、PP组(10个坐标)、PS组(5个坐标)、CT组和MT组(各4个)。
结论 不同的间隔物获取方法会产生不同厚度的油灰重衬间隔物。CT组和MT组用作间隔物时,为角度(线/点)和表面(弯曲/平坦)提供了最高的坐标精度。