• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局

Long-term oncological outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

作者信息

Hirano Yasumitsu, Hiranuma Chikashi, Hattori Masakazu, Douden Kenji, Yamaguchi Shigeki

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):408-411. doi: 10.1111/ans.15076. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/ans.15076
PMID:30873699
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively reviewed our consecutive experience from the introduction of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPS) for colon cancer, and its 5-year oncological outcomes are evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 288 patients (140 males) with a mean age of 71.5 years were treated with the single-port laparoscopic colectomy for stage I, II and III colon cancers. Exclusion criteria of SPS were patients with unresolved bowel obstruction, T4b tumour, tumour perforation and severe medical illness.

RESULTS

In 20 patients (6.9%), we inserted an extra port mainly to transect the rectum. The median follow-up period was 52 months. The 5-year relapse-free survival rates in stage I, II and III patients were 95.8%, 80.2% and 61.6%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for stage I, II and III patients were 97.4%, 85.3% and 72.9%, respectively. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates in patients diagnosed pathologically T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 100%, 100%, 92.1% and 73.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SPS colectomy can be applied to the treatment of colon cancer with good long-term oncological outcomes. However, we should pay more attention when we treat the pathologically diagnosed T4 tumours.

摘要

背景

我们回顾性分析了自开展单孔腹腔镜手术(SPS)治疗结肠癌以来的连续病例,并评估了其5年肿瘤学结局。

方法

共有288例患者(140例男性)接受了单孔腹腔镜结肠癌切除术,平均年龄71.5岁,包括I期、II期和III期结肠癌患者。SPS的排除标准为肠梗阻未缓解、T4b肿瘤、肿瘤穿孔及严重内科疾病患者。

结果

20例患者(6.9%)额外增加了一个端口,主要用于横断直肠。中位随访期为52个月。I期、II期和III期患者的5年无复发生存率分别为95.8%、80.2%和61.6%。I期、II期和III期患者的5年总生存率分别为97.4%、85.3%和72.9%。病理诊断为T1、T2、T3和T4的患者5年肿瘤特异性生存率分别为100%、100%、92.1%和73.9%。

结论

SPS结肠切除术可应用于结肠癌治疗,长期肿瘤学结局良好。然而,在治疗病理诊断为T4的肿瘤时应更加谨慎。

相似文献

1
Long-term oncological outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):408-411. doi: 10.1111/ans.15076. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术治疗结肠腺癌:一项11年回顾性研究及5年生存率分析
Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):643-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8921-y. Epub 2005 Mar 28.
3
Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching.单部位腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的长期疗效:与传统多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术使用倾向评分匹配法的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000810.
4
Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort.全国范围内结肠癌腹腔镜手术的实施:基于人群队列的短期结果和长期生存情况
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4853-4864. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4819-8. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
Single Port and Conventional Laparoscopy in Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Two Techniques.结直肠手术中的单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术:两种技术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):65-70. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0331. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术:提高化疗指南的依从性及生存率。
Surgery. 2017 Jun;161(6):1633-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
7
Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌根治术治疗 TNM 分期 III 期结肠癌的前瞻性多中心研究结果。
Surg Today. 2012 Nov;42(11):1071-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0292-8. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
8
The Radical Extent of lymphadenectomy - D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.淋巴结清扫的根治范围——D2 清扫术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的全结肠系膜切除术治疗右侧结肠癌(RELARC)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 8;17(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1710-9.
9
Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中完整系膜切除与传统系膜切除的肿瘤学结局
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):E698-E702. doi: 10.1111/ans.14493. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
10
Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse and descending colon cancer: Short-term and long-term outcomes of a multicenter retrospective study of 1830 patients.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗横结肠癌和降结肠癌:1830例患者多中心回顾性研究的短期和长期结果
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 Aug;10(3):268-275. doi: 10.1111/ases.12373. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous ileocolic and abdominoperineal resection using the da Vinci SP system for synchronous triple colorectal cancer: a case report.使用达芬奇SP系统同步进行回结肠和腹会阴联合切除术治疗同时性三原发结直肠癌:一例病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jul 28;2025(7):rjaf565. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf565. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A first report of right-hemicolectomy for ascending colon cancer in Japan with the da Vinci SP surgical robot system.日本首例使用达芬奇SP手术机器人系统进行升结肠癌右半结肠切除术的报告。
Surg Case Rep. 2024 May 21;10(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-01922-w.
3
Single incision laparoscopy versus conventional multiport laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
单孔腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Nov;105(8):709-720. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0132. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Comparison of clinical efficacy of single-incision and traditional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.单孔与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效比较:一项随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;12:997894. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.997894. eCollection 2022.
5
Minimally invasive surgery laparotomy in patients with colon cancer residing in high-altitude areas.高海拔地区结肠癌患者的微创手术与剖腹手术
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Dec 16;9(35):10919-10926. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.10919.
6
Single-Incision vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌:系统评价与Meta分析的更新
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 23;8:704986. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.704986. eCollection 2021.
7
Long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: results of a propensity score-based analysis.单切口与多端口腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的长期疗效:基于倾向评分分析的结果
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1027-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08367-4. Epub 2021 Feb 26.