Fang Kaibin, Xu Shuangta, Zheng Yuhui, Huang Long, Chen Shoubo, Wu Shiqiang, Wang Wenhuai
Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou Fujian, 362000, P.R.China.
Department of Tumor Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou Fujian, 362000, P.R.China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 15;33(3):323-327. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201808141.
To compare the effectiveness of thoracoscopic assisted reduction and traditional manual reduction with percutaneous intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of mid-clavicular fractures.
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Twenty-two patients with mid-clavicular fractures who met the selection criteria between March 2012 and March 2017 were recruited and randomly divided into trial group (7 cases, thoracoscopic assisted reduction and percutaneous intramedullary nail fixation) and control group (15 cases, traditional manual reduction and percutaneous intramedullary nail fixation). There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, cause of injury, fracture classification, interval between injury and operation between the two groups ( >0.05). The operation time and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The effectiveness was evaluated by Constant-Murley scale at 6 months after operation, which included subjective evaluation indexes (functional activity and pain) and objective evaluation indexes (range of motion of shoulder joint and muscle strength).
The operation time of the trial group was significantly longer than that of the control group ( =5.881, =0.000). Patients in both groups were followed up 7-20 months, with an average of 11 months. Satisfactory anatomical reduction achieved in all patients, and all incisions healed by first intension. In the control group, 1 patient had difficulty in removing the intramedullary nail, and 1 patient had fracture nonunion. No fracture nonunion or intramedullary nail rupture in the other patients of two groups. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( =0.764, =0.453). At 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in Constant-Murley scale between the two groups ( >0.05).
The treatment of the mid-clavicular fracture by using thoracoscopic assisted reduction with intramedullary nail internal fixation requires longer operation time, but does not require fluoroscopy. The effectiveness is comparable to that of traditional surgery.
比较胸腔镜辅助复位与传统手法复位联合经皮髓内钉内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折的疗效。
进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验。选取2012年3月至2017年3月间符合入选标准的22例锁骨中段骨折患者,随机分为试验组(7例,胸腔镜辅助复位及经皮髓内钉固定)和对照组(15例,传统手法复位及经皮髓内钉固定)。两组患者在性别、年龄、患侧、受伤原因、骨折分型、受伤至手术间隔时间方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间及骨折愈合时间。术后6个月采用Constant-Murley评分评估疗效,包括主观评估指标(功能活动及疼痛)和客观评估指标(肩关节活动范围及肌力)。
试验组手术时间显著长于对照组(t=5.881,P=0.000)。两组患者均随访7-20个月,平均11个月。所有患者均获得满意的解剖复位,所有切口均一期愈合。对照组有1例患者取出髓内钉困难,1例患者骨折不愈合。两组其他患者均未出现骨折不愈合或髓内钉断裂。两组骨折愈合时间差异无统计学意义(t=0.764,P=0.453)。术后6个月,两组Constant-Murley评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
胸腔镜辅助复位联合髓内钉内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折手术时间较长,但无需透视,疗效与传统手术相当。