Tang Hongwei, Yin Yong, Han Qintian, Xu Xiaoping, Li Yunfei
Department of Orthopaedics, Jiading Center Hospital, Shanghai, 201800, P.R.China.
Department of Orthopaedics, Jiading Center Hospital, Shanghai, 201800,
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 15;32(9):1181-1186. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201803127.
To investigate the effectiveness of anatomical locking plate internal fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in treatment of the Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures by comparing with the simple anatomical locking plate internal fixation.
The clinical data of 40 patients with Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures who met the criteria between February 2013 and January 2017 were analyzed. Eighteen cases were treated with anatomical locking plate internal fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction by using a suture anchor (reconstruction group), and 22 cases were treated only with anatomical locking plate internal fixation (non-reconstruction group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, causes of injury, associated injuries, time from injury to operation between 2 groups ( >0.05). The operation time, medical expense, postoperative coracoclavicular distance, Constant-Murley scores of injured side, and complications were recorded and compared between 2 groups.
All patients were followed up 12-27 months (mean, 16.3 months). One patient in reconstruction group had superficial wound infection. One patient in non-reconstruction group had pullout of screws from the distal fragment and reduction loss at 1 month postoperatively. The operation time and medical expense in reconstruction group significantly increased when compared with those in non-reconstruction group ( <0.05). All fractures in 2 groups achieved bony union at last follow-up. The rate of coracoclavicular distance increase of injured side in non-reconstruction group was significantly higher than that in reconstruction group ( =2.371, =0.023). The Constant-Murley scores at 1 month, 3 months after operation, and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values in 2 groups ( <0.05), but no significant difference was observed between 2 groups ( >0.05).
Both anatomical locking plate internal fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction can achieve good effectiveness for the Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures. Therefore, the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction does not need, except for comminuted fractures with the length of lateral fragment less than 1 cm or the patients with poor compliance.
通过与单纯解剖锁定钢板内固定进行比较,探讨解剖锁定钢板内固定联合喙锁韧带重建治疗NeerⅡb型锁骨远端骨折的有效性。
分析2013年2月至2017年1月期间符合标准的40例NeerⅡb型锁骨远端骨折患者的临床资料。18例采用缝线锚钉行解剖锁定钢板内固定联合喙锁韧带重建(重建组),22例仅采用解剖锁定钢板内固定(非重建组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、患侧、损伤原因、合并损伤、受伤至手术时间等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、医疗费用、术后喙锁间距、患侧Constant-Murley评分及并发症情况。
所有患者均获随访12~27个月(平均16.3个月)。重建组1例患者发生表浅伤口感染。非重建组1例患者术后1个月出现远端骨折块螺钉拔出及复位丢失。重建组手术时间和医疗费用较非重建组显著增加(P<0.05)。末次随访时两组骨折均达到骨性愈合。非重建组患侧喙锁间距增加率显著高于重建组(P=2.371,P=0.023)。两组术后1个月、3个月及末次随访时Constant-Murley评分较术前均显著改善(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
解剖锁定钢板内固定联合或不联合喙锁韧带重建治疗NeerⅡb型锁骨远端骨折均能取得较好疗效。因此,除外侧骨折块长度小于1 cm的粉碎性骨折或依从性差的患者外,无需进行喙锁韧带重建。